Patrick, Srey and All, I don't understand why these subfields were not included in the browse indexes. Here is my attempt at a comprehensive list of the fields and subfields that should be included in the browse indexes. It is extensive, and I may have missed some, but this will take us a lot farther down the road than we are now. Source: OCLC Bibliographic Formats and Standards *Author Index* 100 a, b, c, d, q, 110 a, b, c, d, g, k, l, n, p, u 111 a, c, d, e, n, 700 a, b, c, d, f, k, m, n, p, q, r, s, t 710 a, b, c, d, f, k, n, p, s, t, u 711 a, c, d, e, f, g, j, k, l, n, p, t *Title Index* 130 a, d, f, k, l, m, n, o, r, s 222 a, b 240 a, d, k, l, m, n, o, p, r, s, 245 a, b, k, n, p, s 246 a, b, f, 247 a, b, n, p 505 t 730 a, d, f, g, k, l, m, n, o, p, r, s, 740 a, n, p 700 t 710 t 711 t 780 t 785 t *Subject index* 600 a, b, c, d, k, l, m, n, o, p, q, r, s, t, u, v, x, y, z 610 a, b, c, d, f, g, k, l, n, p, s, t, u, v, x, y, z 611 a, c, d, e, f, j, k, l, n, p, t, u, v, x, y, z 630 a, d, f, l, l, m, n, o, p, r, s, v, x, y, z 650 a, v, x, y, z 651 a, v, x, y, z *Series Index* 490 Do Not Index 440 a, d, f, g, k, l, m, n, o, p, r, s, t (not sure, no longer valid) 800 a, c, d, f, k, l, m, n, o, p, q, r, s, t 810 a, b, c, d, f, k, l, m, n, o, p, q, r, s, t 811 a, c, d, f, k, l, n, o, p, q, s, t 830 a, d, f, g, k, l, m, n, o, p, r, s, t On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Patrick Gardella <