Deleting monograph parts that are attached to copies should require permission and confirmation
Bug #1334842 reported by
Justin Hopkins
This bug affects 8 people
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Evergreen |
Confirmed
|
Wishlist
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Currently, as of 2.6.1, it's possible for a user (with permissions to manage monograph parts) to delete monograph part entries and that those entries will be removed from any copies already using them. We think this violates the existing permissions that should prevent a user in one system from editing the items belonging to another system.
I'd propose that users be prompted before removing "parts in use" and that an additional permission be created to allow the override.
Also, rather than parts being deleted, a deleted = t/f flag could be used so that erroneously deleted parts could be restored if necessary.
Changed in evergreen: | |
status: | New → Triaged |
importance: | Undecided → Wishlist |
tags: | added: parts |
tags: |
added: cat-parts permissions removed: parts |
To post a comment you must log in.
3.9.1
We are having issues with parts being deleted while items are still attached. Would it be possible to treat parts like we treat bib records with holdings? The deletion is denied because there are still holdings attached.