Comment 12 for bug 1304462

Jason is correct. Now, I wouldn't be surprised if OCLC didn't like it but they can't make a legal claim. If there is a concern on that part I can help dig up and/or create records as well.

Excuse my brevity, sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 11, 2014, at 8:34 AM, Jason Stephenson <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> Yamil: You should be able to share your OCLC records with anyone. My
> understanding is that once they are in your catalog, that is allowed. If
> not, then your public access catalog already violates OCLC's alleged
> copyright or whatever they claim.
>
> On the display in search results vs. summary: My code only touches the
> summary. The behavior from the search results list was there before I
> made my changes. Therefore, I think that should be a second bug, but if
> anyone wants to address it in this bug, feel free to out vote me. I
> don't really care either way and I don't really care if the results
> behavior is changed or left as it is.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to
> Evergreen.
> Matching subscriptions: evergreenbugs
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1304462
>
> Title:
> Add 264 tag values to Record Summary
>
> Status in Evergreen - Open ILS:
> New
>
> Bug description:
> We added 264 information for the Producer, Distributor, Manufacturer,
> and Copyright information of the record to our record summary. This is
> in addition to the publisher information that is already displayed.
>
> Thought we'd share this with the community as a RDA-related
> enhancement to the TTOPAC.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1304462/+subscriptions