EDI Invoices: try harder to find SAN, billed amounts, surcharges in the correct places

[Lebbeous Fogle-Weekley]

Bugfix for Evergreen 2.3+:

    EDI invoices: Sometimes NAD/C082/3039 isn't buyer SAN, but EDI acct #

    Address an issue reported by Bill Erickson where a number that seems to
    be buyer SAN in some cases is actually the number from
    acq.edi_account.vendacct in others.

http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=working/Evergreen.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/collab/senator/fix-edi-invoice-ou-lookup

[Bill Erickson (berick)]

I've pushed a sign-off to Lebbeous' original commit, plus one additional related commit to

working => user/berick/acq-invoice-extract-san

[Bill Erickson (berick)]

Found one more issue w/ invoice data extraction. patch coming...

[Bill Erickson (berick)]

Another commit pushed to working => user/berick/acq-invoice-extract-san to make the EDI invoicing more discerning in LI billed amount extraction.

[Lebbeous Fogle-Weekley (lebbeous)]

Interpretations of standard vary widely. Here's another small commit along the lines of "look harder for other places data can hide in an EDI invoice," in this case re surcharges, taxes.

http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=working/Evergreen.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/collab/senator/acq-invoice-other-charges

So now this ticket refers to two branches,

user/berick/acq-invoice-extract-san (with 2 commits)
collab/senator/acq-invoice-other-charges (with 1)

[Bill Erickson (berick)]

Works well. I've pushed a signed-off commit back to my original branch. We're back down to one branch with one un-signed commit.

user/berick/acq-invoice-extract-san

[Bill Erickson (berick)]

Changes in these branches have been included and in some cases superseded by code in bug #1065270. Removing pullrequest and marking as duplicate.