On 2012-01-10 02:56:38, Daniel DeFreez wrote:
> I do not use these specific debug statements much, no. I was going to
> simply cut them out, but instead looked for a fix because I assumed
> somebody wanted them there (and out of curiosity).
Ok, good.
> I apologize for the malformed patch. I wasn't thinking about upstream.
> I'll use the documented format in the future.
No problem! I appreciate the report and the patch.
If I just end up ripping out those messages, I'll mention you in the
Reported-by: commit message tag.
On 2012-01-10 02:56:38, Daniel DeFreez wrote:
> I do not use these specific debug statements much, no. I was going to
> simply cut them out, but instead looked for a fix because I assumed
> somebody wanted them there (and out of curiosity).
Ok, good.
> I apologize for the malformed patch. I wasn't thinking about upstream.
> I'll use the documented format in the future.
No problem! I appreciate the report and the patch.
If I just end up ripping out those messages, I'll mention you in the
Reported-by: commit message tag.