Using S3, "BackendException: No connection to backend"
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Duplicity |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Unassigned | ||
Fedora |
Won't Fix
|
Undecided
|
|||
python-boto (Ubuntu) |
Confirmed
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Trying to backup on S3 traces back:
/home/ubuntu# duplicity /tmp/pippo/ s3+http://
Using archive dir: /root/.
Using backup name: b9fbae4eed85b4a
Import of duplicity.
Import of duplicity.
Import of duplicity.
Import of duplicity.
Import of duplicity.
Import of duplicity.
Import of duplicity.
Import of duplicity.
Import of duplicity.
Import of duplicity.
Import of duplicity.
Import of duplicity.
Import of duplicity.
Import of duplicity.
Import of duplicity.
Import of duplicity.
Main action: inc
=======
duplicity 0.6.23 (January 24, 2014)
Args: /usr/bin/duplicity /tmp/pippo/ s3+http://
Linux juju-obs-
/usr/bin/python 2.7.6 (default, Jan 12 2014, 08:16:39)
[GCC 4.8.2]
=======
Using temporary directory /tmp/duplicity-
Registering (mkstemp) temporary file /tmp/duplicity-
Temp has 8320397312 available, backup will use approx 34078720.
Releasing lockfile <lockfile.
Removing still remembered temporary file /tmp/duplicity-
Backend error detail: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/
with_
File "/usr/bin/
fn()
File "/usr/bin/
do_
File "/usr/bin/
sync_
File "/usr/bin/
remlist = globals.
File "/usr/lib/
return map(tobytes, self._list())
File "/usr/lib/
raise BackendExceptio
BackendException: No connection to backend
BackendException: No connection to backend
On the same machine, with the same parameter, python boto works perfectly.
Changed in duplicity: | |
status: | New → Confirmed |
Changed in duplicity: | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
milestone: | none → 0.7.01 |
status: | Confirmed → Fix Committed |
Changed in duplicity: | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
Changed in fedora: | |
importance: | Unknown → Undecided |
status: | Unknown → Won't Fix |
Vincenzo was talking to me on IRC about this. It's a regression due to the fix for bug 1266753. Not sure why yet. Any ideas?