Support for Amazon Glacier
Bug #1039511 reported by
someone1
This bug affects 69 people
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Duplicity |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Amazon just announced Amazon Glacier: http://
This seems like a better fit for Duplicity in terms of use-case and pricing! I'm sure the Python Boto project will be adding support soon and since Amazon will give the ability to transfer from S3 buckets to Glacier in the coming months, this would be a great feature to keep on the roadmap so a migration to it for S3 users would be seamless.
-Prateek
Related branches
lp:~prateek/duplicity/s3-glacier
- edso: Needs Information
-
Diff: 998 lines (+321/-416)8 files modifiedREADME (+1/-0)
bin/duplicity (+11/-0)
bin/duplicity.1 (+38/-0)
duplicity/backends/_boto_multi.py (+75/-308)
duplicity/backends/_boto_single.py (+171/-104)
duplicity/backends/botobackend.py (+11/-4)
duplicity/commandline.py (+8/-0)
duplicity/globals.py (+6/-0)
security vulnerability: | no → yes |
security vulnerability: | yes → no |
Changed in duplicity: | |
milestone: | none → 0.6.24 |
status: | New → Fix Committed |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
Changed in duplicity: | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
To post a comment you must log in.
I'd like to see a way to direct "full" backups to Glacier. I don't know how useful it would be to store incremental backups there.
This is what I'm thinking:
Use duplicity and S3 to store full/incremental backups on a frequent schedule (daily, etc.).
Use duplicity and Glacier to store full backups that I schedule and run on an infrequent schedule (weekly, monthly, etc.).