Client options grouping needs revising
Bug #648760 reported by
Andrew Hutchings
on 2010-09-27
This bug affects 1 person
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drizzle |
Low
|
Brian Aker | ||
| 7.0 |
Low
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Currently the drizzle client boost::
On a related note, there are common client options for all the client apps (such as --host and --user). These should be bundled up into a group in a single common file which the client apps include.
Olaf van der Spek (olafvdspek) wrote : | #1 |
Andrew Hutchings (linuxjedi) wrote : | #2 |
Hi Olaf,
Not quite what I mean. Basically the program options in the C++ files are grouped and there are common options which are duplicated in all our clients. These should be unified in a single C++/.h file.
tags: | added: low-hanging-fruit |
Brian Aker (brianaker)
on 2012-01-03
Changed in drizzle: | |
assignee: | nobody → Brian Aker (brianaker) |
status: | Confirmed → In Progress |
To post a comment you must log in.
> These should be bundled up into a group in a single common file which the client apps include.
MySQL used my.cnf for that (in /etc and in /home). Doesn't Drizzle support that already?