Client options grouping needs revising

Bug #648760 reported by Andrew Hutchings on 2010-09-27
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Drizzle
Low
Brian Aker
7.0
Low
Unassigned

Bug Description

Currently the drizzle client boost::program_options stuff is split up into groups of options inside each client. Unfortunately in some cases the grouping is not ideal, so this needs going through and correcting.

On a related note, there are common client options for all the client apps (such as --host and --user). These should be bundled up into a group in a single common file which the client apps include.

Olaf van der Spek (olafvdspek) wrote :

> These should be bundled up into a group in a single common file which the client apps include.

MySQL used my.cnf for that (in /etc and in /home). Doesn't Drizzle support that already?

Andrew Hutchings (linuxjedi) wrote :

Hi Olaf,

Not quite what I mean. Basically the program options in the C++ files are grouped and there are common options which are duplicated in all our clients. These should be unified in a single C++/.h file.

tags: added: low-hanging-fruit
Brian Aker (brianaker) on 2012-01-03
Changed in drizzle:
assignee: nobody → Brian Aker (brianaker)
status: Confirmed → In Progress
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  Edit
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers