Client options grouping needs revising

Bug #648760 reported by Andrew Hutchings
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Drizzle
In Progress
Low
Brian Aker
7.0
Won't Fix
Low
Unassigned

Bug Description

Currently the drizzle client boost::program_options stuff is split up into groups of options inside each client. Unfortunately in some cases the grouping is not ideal, so this needs going through and correcting.

On a related note, there are common client options for all the client apps (such as --host and --user). These should be bundled up into a group in a single common file which the client apps include.

Revision history for this message
Olaf van der Spek (olafvdspek) wrote :

> These should be bundled up into a group in a single common file which the client apps include.

MySQL used my.cnf for that (in /etc and in /home). Doesn't Drizzle support that already?

Revision history for this message
Andrew Hutchings (linuxjedi) wrote :

Hi Olaf,

Not quite what I mean. Basically the program options in the C++ files are grouped and there are common options which are duplicated in all our clients. These should be unified in a single C++/.h file.

tags: added: low-hanging-fruit
Brian Aker (brianaker)
Changed in drizzle:
assignee: nobody → Brian Aker (brianaker)
status: Confirmed → In Progress
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.