DYNAMIC row format not being used in HEAP

[Stewart Smith]

Pretty sure this means that we're using fixed sized records all the time.

This occured somewhere in the switch away from ROW_TYPE to the engine option ROW_FORMAT but before my patch that removed the remnants of row_type from the proto.

[Brian Aker (brianaker)]

Hi!

Can you confirm this?

Cheers,
 -Brian

On Jun 28, 2010, at 5:37 PM, Stewart Smith wrote:

> Public bug reported:
>
> Pretty sure this means that we're using fixed sized records all the
> time.
>
> This occured somewhere in the switch away from ROW_TYPE to the engine
> option ROW_FORMAT but before my patch that removed the remnants of
> row_type from the proto.
>
> ** Affects: drizzle
> Importance: Undecided
> Status: New
>
> --
> DYNAMIC row format not being used in HEAP
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599605
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Drizzle-
> developers, which is subscribed to Drizzle.
>
> Status in A Lightweight SQL Database for Cloud and Web: New
>
> Bug description:
> Pretty sure this means that we're using fixed sized records all the time.
>
> This occured somewhere in the switch away from ROW_TYPE to the engine option ROW_FORMAT but before my patch that removed the remnants of row_type from the proto.
>
>

[Stewart Smith (stewart)]

This'll be disabled due to bugs in the dynamic row implementation inside the HEAP engine we have. Should be able to provide patches at some point "soon".

[Stewart Smith (stewart)]

Closing as Won't Fix due to bugs in our current dynamic row format code.