| 2008-10-31 02:19:52 |
Andrea Cimitan |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2008-10-31 02:23:45 |
Andrea Cimitan |
description |
I can't get relevance to work.
If I type "ff" the first result I get is openoffice, but I've launched firefox thousands of time and it is still the fourth result.
What's going on? |
I can't get relevance to work.
If I type "ff" the first result I get is openoffice, but I've launched firefox thousands of time and it is still the fourth result.
Firefox gains one position (fspot) but not openoffice, maybe the "ff" of openo"ff"ice it's too important?
What's going on? |
|
| 2008-10-31 02:24:42 |
Andrea Cimitan |
description |
I can't get relevance to work.
If I type "ff" the first result I get is openoffice, but I've launched firefox thousands of time and it is still the fourth result.
Firefox gains one position (fspot) but not openoffice, maybe the "ff" of openo"ff"ice it's too important?
What's going on? |
I can't get relevance to work.
If I type "ff" the first result I get is openoffice, but I've launched firefox thousands of time and it is still the fourth result.
Firefox gains one position (fspot) but not openoffice, maybe the "ff" of openo"ff"ice is too important?
What's going on? |
|
| 2008-11-08 18:52:50 |
Jason Smith |
do: assignee |
|
jassmith |
|
| 2008-11-08 18:52:50 |
Jason Smith |
do: statusexplanation |
|
This is a very hard balance to strike. There is always some edge case we seem to kill to fix another. Yes it can be hard to beat a very short and precise string match. A single f on its own should get you firefox with ease however.
Jason |
|
| 2008-12-05 09:08:27 |
David Siegel |
do: status |
New |
Confirmed |
|
| 2008-12-05 09:08:27 |
David Siegel |
do: assignee |
jassmith |
djsiegel |
|
| 2008-12-05 09:08:27 |
David Siegel |
do: statusexplanation |
This is a very hard balance to strike. There is always some edge case we seem to kill to fix another. Yes it can be hard to beat a very short and precise string match. A single f on its own should get you firefox with ease however.
Jason |
I may know a fairly simple way to account for these type of abbreviations that will not adversely affect other matches. |
|
| 2008-12-05 09:08:45 |
David Siegel |
title |
Is Relevance working? |
Do does not seem to learn certain abbreviations |
|
| 2009-06-18 08:37:13 |
Robert Dyer |
do: importance |
Undecided |
Low |
|
