dib fails when using a dedicated /tmp mount point

Bug #1719102 reported by Andreas Florath
18
This bug affects 3 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
diskimage-builder
In Progress
Undecided
Andreas Florath

Bug Description

Using a dedicated (i.e. used defined) /tmp disk / volume / mount-point, dib currently fails with:

    2017-09-23 15:04:29.043 INFO diskimage_builder.block_device.utils [-] Calling [sudo umount /tmp/dib_build.mTZQWuvY/mnt/tmp]
    2017-09-23 15:04:29.051 DEBUG diskimage_builder.block_device.utils [-] exec_sudo: umount: /tmp/dib_build.mTZQWuvY/mnt/tmp: target is busy exec_sudo /data/home/dib/DIB/diskimage-
builder/diskimage_builder/block_device/utils.py:120
    2017-09-23 15:04:29.051 DEBUG diskimage_builder.block_device.utils [-] exec_sudo: (In some cases useful info about processes that exec_sudo /data/home/dib/DIB/diskimage-builder/diskimage_builder/block_device/utils.py:120
    2017-09-23 15:04:29.052 DEBUG diskimage_builder.block_device.utils [-] exec_sudo: use the device is found by lsof(8) or fuser(1).) exec_sudo /data/home/dib/DIB/diskimage-builder/diskimage_builder/block_device/utils.py:120
    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "/data/home/dib/DIB/venv/bin/dib-block-device", line 10, in <module>
        sys.exit(main())
      File "/data/home/dib/DIB/diskimage-builder/diskimage_builder/block_device/cmd.py", line 120, in main
        return bdc.main()
      File "/data/home/dib/DIB/diskimage-builder/diskimage_builder/block_device/cmd.py", line 115, in main
        self.args.func()
      File "/data/home/dib/DIB/diskimage-builder/diskimage_builder/block_device/cmd.py", line 39, in cmd_umount
        self.bd.cmd_umount()
      File "/data/home/dib/DIB/diskimage-builder/diskimage_builder/block_device/blockdevice.py", line 420, in cmd_umount
        node.umount()
      File "/data/home/dib/DIB/diskimage-builder/diskimage_builder/block_device/level3/mount.py", line 109, in umount
        exec_sudo(["umount", self.state['mount'][self.mount_point]['path']])
      File "/data/home/dib/DIB/diskimage-builder/diskimage_builder/block_device/utils.py", line 125, in exec_sudo
        ' '.join(sudo_cmd))
    subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command 'sudo umount /tmp/dib_build.mTZQWuvY/mnt/tmp' returned non-zero exit status 32

A analyze shows, that the mount / umounts are not called in the correct order in this case:

    Sep 23 15:04:24 deb-mirror sudo[12723]: dib : TTY=pts/1 ; PWD=/data/home/dib/DIB/infra-build-images ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/bin/mount --bind /tmp/dib_build.mTZQWuvY/hooks /tmp/dib_build.mTZQWuvY/mnt/tmp/in_target.d
    Sep 23 15:04:24 deb-mirror sudo[12727]: dib : TTY=pts/1 ; PWD=/data/home/dib/DIB/infra-build-images ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/bin/mount -o remount,ro,bind /tmp/dib_build.mTZQWuvY/hooks /tmp/dib_build.mTZQWuvY/mnt/tmp/in_target.d
    Sep 23 15:04:28 deb-mirror sudo[12809]: dib : TTY=pts/1 ; PWD=/data/home/dib/DIB/infra-build-images ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/bin/umount /tmp/dib_build.mTZQWuvY/mnt/data
    Sep 23 15:04:28 deb-mirror sudo[12815]: dib : TTY=pts/1 ; PWD=/data/home/dib/DIB/infra-build-images ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/bin/umount /tmp/dib_build.mTZQWuvY/mnt/var/tmp
    Sep 23 15:04:28 deb-mirror sudo[12821]: dib : TTY=pts/1 ; PWD=/data/home/dib/DIB/infra-build-images ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/bin/umount /tmp/dib_build.mTZQWuvY/mnt/var/log
    Sep 23 15:04:28 deb-mirror sudo[12827]: dib : TTY=pts/1 ; PWD=/data/home/dib/DIB/infra-build-images ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/bin/umount /tmp/dib_build.mTZQWuvY/mnt/home
    Sep 23 15:04:29 deb-mirror sudo[12833]: dib : TTY=pts/1 ; PWD=/data/home/dib/DIB/infra-build-images ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/bin/umount /tmp/dib_build.mTZQWuvY/mnt/tmp

So 'umount /mnt/tmp' is called - even if /mnt/tmp/in_target.d is still mounted.

Using today's master (commit ab1ed1e59a3dd73c66f7bed9823d1d0a74d02244)

Revision history for this message
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote : Fix proposed to diskimage-builder (master)

Fix proposed to branch: master
Review: https://review.openstack.org/506865

Changed in diskimage-builder:
assignee: nobody → Andreas Florath (ansreas)
status: New → In Progress
Revision history for this message
Clenimar Filemon (clenimar-filemon) wrote :
Revision history for this message
David Noriega (dmnoriega) wrote :

I ran into this issue when following the directions for building a fedora-atomic image for Magnum. I didn't exhaustively check every version after 2.3.3, but I found that to be the last version that worked.

Revision history for this message
David Noriega (dmnoriega) wrote :
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.