Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:43:30 -0500
From: Clint Adams <email address hidden>
To: Paolo Bonzini <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>,
"Brian M. Carlson" <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#281639: sed: documentation is non-free
> The manual is free as long as there are no invariant sections, isn't it?
I think there was a consensus previously that the GNU FDL was free as
long as there were no Invariant Sections or Cover Texts.
I think the current consensus may be as is described at
This issue gets an exemption for the sarge release policy,
Hopefully Mr. Carlson will jump in here if I've completely failed to
understand the issue.
If the documentation could be relicensed under the GPL, or dual-licensed
under the GPL and FDL, I think everyone might be satisfied. I could be
mistaken about this as well.