Comment 14 for bug 19890

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 11:54:51 +1000
From: Jamie Wilkinson <email address hidden>
To: Clint Adams <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#320375: conquest-gl: fail to start (Assertion
 `window->Window.VisualInfo != ((void *)0)' failed.)

This one time, at band camp, Clint Adams wrote:
>> That assertion looks similar to those that occur when glutInit has not been
>> called; if that's not the case, then please hold out for the new version of
>> freeglut that I will be uploading soon, which among other fixes, reduces the
>> severity of assertions throughout the code.
>
>It seems impossible that glutInit() would not have been called. What
>now?

I hate to sound patronising, but does glutInit definitely get called before
any other glut call?

I'll prepare an upload of freeglut 2.4 Real Soon Now, and then we'll see if
the assertion still appears.