Activity log for bug #1883880

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2020-06-17 11:33:52 Christian Ehrhardt  bug added bug
2020-06-17 11:34:01 Christian Ehrhardt  nominated for series Ubuntu Bionic
2020-06-17 11:34:01 Christian Ehrhardt  bug task added binutils (Ubuntu Bionic)
2020-06-17 11:34:07 Christian Ehrhardt  binutils (Ubuntu): status New Fix Released
2020-06-17 11:49:40 Frode Nordahl bug added subscriber Frode Nordahl
2020-06-17 12:49:42 Harry van Haaren (Intel) bug added subscriber Harry van Haaren
2020-06-17 15:01:57 Bruce Richardson (Intel) bug added subscriber Bruce Richardson (Intel)
2020-06-18 14:38:44 Christian Ehrhardt  bug added subscriber Luca Boccassi
2020-06-19 07:24:43 Launchpad Janitor merge proposal linked https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+git/binutils/+merge/386073
2020-06-19 07:30:30 Christian Ehrhardt  description Hi, DPDK has run into some issues in the past https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97 https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=249 Eventually the issues got resolved in binutils via https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23465 After binutils is fixed people rebuilding DPDK themselve can use http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/71679/ to gain more performance while on Bionics bintuils level. Note: Bionic is on DPDK 17.11.x which will not get further stable release afaik. But quite often people build their own DPDK. In fact this came up as a request from Openvswitch upstream/Intel to allow such builds on Bionic. I'd ping those people about the bug and ask them to participate in the verification if this becomes an SRU. [Impact] * the assembler scales non 8 bit cases which was identified to break e.g. some AVX512 code. It is nasty as it isn't a compile/link/ time error. Instead the instructions might silently be corrupted until running. Things might even work on some but fail on other systems if e.g. the AVX code paths only run on newer chips. * The fix is upstream for a while and not re-changed again. Furthermore it is in several Ubuntu releases without bugs due to that, which should make the backport rather safe. [Test Case] * Simple example to trigger the bug: echo "vmovaps 0x40(,%rax,1),%zmm0" | as --64 -o avx.o && objdump -d avx.o | grep vmovaps The expected output is that the objdump output matches the vmovaps instruction input. When using binutils with the bug, the initial 0x40 will be incorrect. Working: $ echo "vmovaps 0x40(,%rax,1),%zmm0" | as --64 -o avx.o && objdump -d avx.o | grep vmovaps 0: 62 f1 7c 48 28 04 05 vmovaps 0x40(,%rax,1),%zmm0 Failing: $ echo "vmovaps 0x40(,%rax,1),%zmm0" | as --64 -o avx.o && objdump -d avx.o | grep vmovaps 0: 62 f1 7c 48 28 04 05 vmovaps 0x1(,%rax,1),%zmm0 [Regression Potential] * Well, this is a double edged sword. On one hand this is fortunately a small change and only affects something formerly clearly broken. So it should be good and only change cases formerly being bad. But OTOH binutils areused in so many cases that I feel unable to say "nothing will happen". The change goes to the gnu assembler, so that is the place to look out for regressions. [Other Info] * needs a sponsor experienced with binutils to check potential pitfalls --- Hi, DPDK has run into some issues in the past  https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97  https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=249 Eventually the issues got resolved in binutils via  https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23465 After binutils is fixed people rebuilding DPDK themselve can use  http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/71679/ to gain more performance while on Bionics bintuils level. Note: Bionic is on DPDK 17.11.x which will not get further stable release afaik. But quite often people build their own DPDK. In fact this came up as a request from Openvswitch upstream/Intel to allow such builds on Bionic. I'd ping those people about the bug and ask them to participate in the verification if this becomes an SRU.
2020-06-19 07:33:40 Christian Ehrhardt  binutils (Ubuntu Bionic): assignee Matthias Klose (doko)
2020-06-24 05:25:34 Christian Ehrhardt  binutils (Ubuntu Bionic): status New In Progress
2020-06-24 05:25:37 Christian Ehrhardt  binutils (Ubuntu Bionic): assignee Matthias Klose (doko) Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer)
2020-06-24 05:25:45 Christian Ehrhardt  tags server-next
2020-06-24 05:25:58 Christian Ehrhardt  bug added subscriber Ubuntu Server
2020-07-15 15:56:34 Robie Basak binutils (Ubuntu Bionic): status In Progress Fix Committed
2020-07-15 15:56:36 Robie Basak bug added subscriber Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team
2020-07-15 15:56:39 Robie Basak bug added subscriber SRU Verification
2020-07-15 15:56:44 Robie Basak tags server-next server-next verification-needed verification-needed-bionic
2020-07-16 13:18:29 Christian Ehrhardt  tags server-next verification-needed verification-needed-bionic server-next verification-done verification-done-bionic
2020-07-16 14:38:33 Christian Ehrhardt  bug watch added https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=963702
2020-07-16 14:38:33 Christian Ehrhardt  bug task added binutils (Debian)
2020-07-20 20:30:44 Bug Watch Updater binutils (Debian): status Unknown Confirmed
2020-08-04 07:45:02 Łukasz Zemczak removed subscriber Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team
2020-08-04 07:45:01 Launchpad Janitor binutils (Ubuntu Bionic): status Fix Committed Fix Released
2023-06-03 02:21:08 Bug Watch Updater binutils (Debian): status Confirmed Fix Released