backport vim 7 to dapper

Bug #52539 reported by auxbuss
52
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Dapper Backports
Fix Released
Medium
Reinhard Tartler
vim (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

VIM7 introduces many interesting new features.

The package from edgy does not compile in dapper because it uses features from a newer dpkg which is not in dapper. However, it is rather easy to remove this dependency as done in the package from backports.org

Revision history for this message
Dennis Kaarsemaker (dennis) wrote :

punting to -backports

Changed in vim:
status: Unconfirmed → Rejected
Revision history for this message
John Dong (jdong) wrote :

Cool; will take a look.

Changed in dapper-backports:
importance: Untriaged → Medium
status: Unconfirmed → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Reinhard Tartler (siretart) wrote :

I've rebuilt the packages for dapper (i386 and amd64) here:
http://siretart.tauware.de/vim7-for-dapper/

I needed to bake out some changes from debian/control, so a 'normal' backport is not possible. Please try these packages and give some feedback

description: updated
Revision history for this message
Liam McDermott (liam-intermedia-online) wrote :

Have tried this and get the following error from GDebi:

   "Error: Failed to satisfy broken dependencies (broken cache)"

When installing "vim-common_7.0-035+1ubuntu2~dapper0.1_i386". This happened after I attempted to install the package.

Just found the fix: had to go into Synaptic and select "Fix Broken Packages" from the "Edit" menu. I didn't realise you had to remove the existing Vim packages before installing the new ones. Hope this helps anyone who has the same problems. Would also like to know how I would have done that through the command line, that was the first thing I tried, but couldn't find anything that would fix the problems.

Once up and running, all seems fine (have installed vim-common, vim-runtime, vim-gui and vim-full all i386 versions).

Revision history for this message
Liam McDermott (liam-intermedia-online) wrote : Re: [Bug 52539] Re: backport vim 7 to dapper

Hi,

I am without e-mail access until Sunday 10th September 2006. Your e-mail will be read and responded to then.

Apologies for any inconvenience caused.

Kind Regards,
Liam McDermott.

Revision history for this message
Liam McDermott (liam-intermedia-online) wrote : Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: backport vim 7 to dapper

Hi,

I am without e-mail access until Sunday 10th September 2006. Your e-mail will be read and responded to then.

Apologies for any inconvenience caused.

Kind Regards,
Liam McDermott.

Revision history for this message
Liam McDermott (liam-intermedia-online) wrote : Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: backport vim 7 to dapper

Hi,

I am without e-mail access until Sunday 10th September 2006. Your e-mail will be read and responded to then.

Apologies for any inconvenience caused.

Kind Regards,
Liam McDermott.

Revision history for this message
Liam McDermott (liam-intermedia-online) wrote : Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: backport vim 7 to dapper

Hi,

I am without e-mail access until Sunday 10th September 2006. Your e-mail will be read and responded to then.

Apologies for any inconvenience caused.

Kind Regards,
Liam McDermott.

Revision history for this message
Liam McDermott (liam-intermedia-online) wrote : Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: backport vim 7 to dapper

Hi,

I am without e-mail access until Sunday 10th September 2006. Your e-mail will be read and responded to then.

Apologies for any inconvenience caused.

Kind Regards,
Liam McDermott.

Revision history for this message
Liam McDermott (liam-intermedia-online) wrote : Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: backport vim 7 to dapper

Hi,

I am without e-mail access until Sunday 10th September 2006. Your e-mail will be read and responded to then.

Apologies for any inconvenience caused.

Kind Regards,
Liam McDermott.

Revision history for this message
Liam McDermott (liam-intermedia-online) wrote : Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: backport vim 7 to dapper

Hi,

I am without e-mail access until Sunday 10th September 2006. Your e-mail will be read and responded to then.

Apologies for any inconvenience caused.

Kind Regards,
Liam McDermott.

Revision history for this message
Liam McDermott (liam-intermedia-online) wrote : Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: backport vim 7 to dapper

Hi,

I am without e-mail access until Sunday 10th September 2006. Your e-mail will be read and responded to then.

Apologies for any inconvenience caused.

Kind Regards,
Liam McDermott.

Revision history for this message
Liam McDermott (liam-intermedia-online) wrote : Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: backport vim 7 to dapper

Hi,

I am without e-mail access until Sunday 10th September 2006. Your e-mail will be read and responded to then.

Apologies for any inconvenience caused.

Kind Regards,
Liam McDermott.

Revision history for this message
Liam McDermott (liam-intermedia-online) wrote : Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: [Bug 52539] Re: backport vim 7 to dapper

Hi,

I am without e-mail access until Sunday 10th September 2006. Your e-mail will be read and responded to then.

Apologies for any inconvenience caused.

Kind Regards,
Liam McDermott.

Revision history for this message
Marco Rodrigues (gothicx) wrote :

Please remove Liam McDermott from here, he's always sending two mail's from her auto-responser mail.

Revision history for this message
Liam McDermott (liam-intermedia-online) wrote :

Sorry for the auto-responder. My fault. Won't do it again.

Revision history for this message
Reinhard Tartler (siretart) wrote :

There seems to be some interest in vim7 packages for dapper. While I prepared some test packages, I still have not got any answer whether they work for you or not.

since vim is a rather important package, I'd like to hear some storys how the new package work for you. I have already done a simple 'works for me test' which consists maily of starting and openening a file. I'm more interested in advanced users who are actually using more than the basic features of vim before considering to upload vim7 to dapper-backports.

Revision history for this message
auxbuss (launchpad-auxbuss) wrote :

I can confirm that it works okay. I use it constantly, including use of the latex suite.

Revision history for this message
John Eikenberry (jae) wrote :

I use Dennis' vim7 backport extensively for programming, email and general text editing. I have a fair number of scripts, macros and plugins that all work fine. The spell checking and omni completion both work great, as does every other older feature I use. I use it daily with no problems.

Revision history for this message
zenrox (kergan) wrote :

it installs ,runs, i dont know how to use it do i dont pretend to

Changed in dapper-backports:
assignee: nobody → siretart
status: Confirmed → In Progress
Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

So, just to clarify, an automatic backport from feisty gutsy does *not* work? If you have a manual backport, create a minimal debdiff, attach it here, and upload to dapper-backports directly.

Changed in dapper-backports:
status: In Progress → New
Revision history for this message
Reinhard Tartler (siretart) wrote :

debdiff for vim7 backports. I updated the backport to the latest security upload.

Revision history for this message
Reinhard Tartler (siretart) wrote :

debdiff uploaded to dapper-backports, waiting for archive admins to accept it.

Changed in dapper-backports:
status: New → In Progress
Revision history for this message
Jonathan Riddell (jr) wrote :

accepted

Changed in dapper-backports:
status: In Progress → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Jonathan Riddell (jr) wrote :

and accepted the binary.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.