On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:01 AM Andrea Righi <email address hidden>
wrote:
> Ryan, I've uploaded a new test kernel with the fix mentioned in the
> comment before:
>
> https://kernel.ubuntu.com/~arighi/LP-1796292/4.15.0-56.62~lp1796292+4/
>
> I've performed over 100 installations using curtin-nvme.sh
> (install_count = 100), no hung task timeout. I'll run other stress tests
> to make sure we're not breaking anything else with this fix, but results
> look promising so far.
>
> It'd be great if you could also do a test on your side. Thanks!
>
Thats excellent news. I'm starting my tests on this kernel now.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:01 AM Andrea Righi <email address hidden>
wrote:
> Ryan, I've uploaded a new test kernel with the fix mentioned in the /kernel. ubuntu. com/~arighi/ LP-1796292/ 4.15.0- 56.62~lp1796292 +4/
> comment before:
>
> https:/
>
> I've performed over 100 installations using curtin-nvme.sh
> (install_count = 100), no hung task timeout. I'll run other stress tests
> to make sure we're not breaking anything else with this fix, but results
> look promising so far.
>
> It'd be great if you could also do a test on your side. Thanks!
>
Thats excellent news. I'm starting my tests on this kernel now.
> /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 1796292 /bugs.launchpad .net/curtin/ +bug/1796292/ +subscriptions
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> Tight timeout for bcache removal causes spurious failures
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https:/
>