Second conclusion: cuneiform (I try refactoring branch) produce error message like "Unknown DIB format CTIImageList::AddImage: invalid image info " if the page has image object. Example cuneiform -v 1871_016.3B 1871_016.3B=> DIB 2544x3300 2544x3300+0+0 1-bit Bilevel DirectClass 24.02MiB 0.210u 0:00.209 ############################ CuneiForm Recognize options: Language: 0 Fax: false Use speller: false Layout options: One Column: false Dot Matrix: false Auto Rotate: false Tables number: 0 Geometry: Rect(Point(0,0), Point(2544,3300)) width:2544; height:3300 FormatOptions: SerifName: Times New Roman SansSerifName: Arial Monospace Name: Courier New Use bold: false Use Italic: false Use font size: false Unrecognized char: '~' Line breaks: false ############################ The image depth is 24 at this point. falseWarning: RSL said that the lines don't need to be erased from the picture. VSL: before table search - 0, after -13 VSL: Нужных изменений не найдено Container CPAGE contains: name : size TYPE_IMAGE : 12032 TYPE_IMAGE : 12032 TYPE_TEXT : 12032 TYPE_TEXT : 12032 TYPE_TEXT : 12032 TYPE_TEXT : 12032 TYPE_TEXT : 12032 TYPE_TEXT : 12032 TYPE_TEXT : 12032 TYPE_TEXT : 12032 TYPE_TEXT : 12032 TYPE_TEXT : 12032 TYPE_TEXT : 12032 Fragment 1 Line 1: <1000> Fragment 2 Line 2: Fragment 3 Line 3: Fragment 3 Line 4: Fragment 3 Line 5: Fragment 3 Line 6: Fragment 3 Line 7: Fragment 3 Line 8: Fragment 3 Line 9: Fragment 3 Line 10: Fragment 3 Line 11: Fragment 3 Line 12: Fragment 3 Line 13: <(Table 6). These results support the suggestion that excessive chan-> Fragment 3 Line 14: Fragment 3 Line 15: Fragment 3 Line 16: Fragment 3 Line 17: Fragment 3 Line 18: Fragment 3 Line 19: Fragment 3 Line 20: Fragment 3 Line 21: <0.035 to 0.06. Research on verification of roughness coefficients for> Fragment 3 Line 22: Fragment 3 Line 23: Fragment 3 Line 24: Fragment 3 Line 25: Fragment 3 Line 26: Fragment 3 Line 27: Fragment 3 Line 28: Fragment 3 Line 29: Fragment 3 Line 30: Fragment 3 Line 31: Fragment 3 Line 32: <(Table 6, site 9), which follows a major shear zone along which> Fragment 3 Line 33: Fragment 3 Line 34: Fragment 3 Line 35: Fragment 3 Line 36: Fragment 3 Line 37: Fragment 3 Line 38: Fragment 3 Line 39: Fragment 3 Line 40: Fragment 3 Line 41: Fragment 3 Line 42: Fragment 3 Line 43: Fragment 4 Line 44: Fragment 4 Line 45: <'�rna> Fragment 4 Line 46: Fragment 4 Line 47: Fragment 4 Line 48: Fragment 4 Line 49: Fragment 4 Line 50: Fragment 4 Line 51: Fragment 4 Line 52: Fragment 4 Line 53: Fragment 4 Line 54: Fragment 4 Line 55: Fragment 4 Line 56: Fragment 4 Line 57: Fragment 4 Line 58: Fragment 4 Line 59: Fragment 4 Line 60: Fragment 4 Line 61: Fragment 5 Line 62: Fragment 5 Line 63: Fragment 6 Line 64: Fragment 6 Line 65: Fragment 6 Line 66: Fragment 6 Line 67: Fragment 6 Line 68: Fragment 6 Line 69: Fragment 6 Line 70: Fragment 6 Line 71: Fragment 6 Line 72: Fragment 6 Line 73: Fragment 6 Line 74: Fragment 6 Line 75: Fragment 6 Line 76: <(1980).> Fragment 7 Line 77: Fragment 8 Line 78:
Fragment 8 Line 79: <2> Fragment 8 Line 80: Fragment 8 Line 81: Fragment 8 Line 82: Fragment 8 Line 83: Fragment 8 Line 84: Fragment 8 Line 85: Fragment 8 Line 86: Fragment 8 Line 87: Fragment 8 Line 88: Fragment 8 Line 89: Fragment 8 Line 90: Fragment 8 Line 91: Fragment 9 Line 92: Fragment10 Line 93: Fragment10 Line 94: Fragment10 Line 95: Fragment10 Line 96: Fragment10 Line 97: Fragment10 Line 98: Fragment10 Line 99: Fragment10 Line100: Fragment10 Line101:
Fragment10 Line102: <( .. radley, 1982, personal commun.) is 4.80 m. The calculated> Fragment10 Line103: <(W. C. Br> Fragment10 Line104: Fragment10 Line105: <7.92 m/s compared to 8.53 m/s computed from equation 10. The> Fragment10 Line106: Fragment10 Line107: Fragment10 Line108: Fragment10 Line109: Fragment10 Line110: Fragment10 Line111: Fragment11 Line112:
Fragment11 Line113: Fragment11 Line114: Unknown DIB format CTIImageList::AddImage: invalid image info Text is recognized correctly, but there are no output file produced