MSN transport: for existing contacts the full ugly JID is showed

Bug #197584 reported by sander
2
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Coccinella
Won't Fix
Medium
Mats

Bug Description

Not sure if this is a bug in either the MSN transport or Coccinella, but I don't have this bug for the AIM transport. When I register to the MSN transport, all contacts already on my test MSN account are showed in Coccinella with the full and ugly JID. So, instead of "<email address hidden>" I see things like "user%<email address hidden>".

sander (s-devrieze)
Changed in coccinella:
assignee: nobody → matsben
importance: Undecided → Medium
Revision history for this message
Mats (matsben) wrote :

In a situation like this it helps tremendously to study the xml I/O. Transports may play tricks and set the name element of the roster item to something automatically. A xml log reveals this. I think I display the bare (ugly) JID by default but haven't checked it.

Revision history for this message
sander (s-devrieze) wrote : Re: [Bug 197584] Re: MSN transport: for existing contacts the full ugly JID is showed

> In a situation like this it helps tremendously to study the xml I/O.
> Transports may play tricks and set the name element of the roster item
> to something automatically. A xml log reveals this. I think I display
> the bare (ugly) JID by default but haven't checked it.

Remember that I can't yet copy/paste from the XML console... ;-)

Oh, yes: you can see this bug in the latest video/screenshot tutorial. :-)

Revision history for this message
Mats (matsben) wrote :

But either you run from a Terminal using
wish8.5
source Coccinella.tcl
or 2-click Wish and you get the console.
From both you may copy text.
Be sure that
set debugLevel 4
is set in Coccinella.tcl

Revision history for this message
Mats (matsben) wrote :

Part of this problem is that they aren't using JID escaping: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0106.html
If the JID had the proper escaping I get instead:

::Roster::GetDisplayName {user\<email address hidden>}
<email address hidden>

It would be possible with a hack but I don't think it is worth it. It is likely to create more problems. Better to stay with protocol definitions.

Changed in coccinella:
status: New → Won't Fix
Revision history for this message
sander (s-devrieze) wrote :

I created a page for "Coccinella" bugs like this one: http://coccinella.im/third-party-issues

Please add more when you discover them...oh yes, wasn't there an issue with the Tlen transport?

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.