Comment 17 for bug 1850642

Hi all, first time commenting, so please do critic :).

My opinion on the matter is that is we use dhclient to do the leasing, maybe we should use it's interface to get the DNS option instead. That way we would avoid having to maintain a mapping of different naming convention.

Now, I understand that dhclient doesn't expose such mapping and that it's decided at compile time;
elafontaine@centos7# strings /sbin/dhclient | grep -i classless
classless static routes option has wrong size or there's some garbage in format
classless-static-routes

Maybe we could try to find a way to interface by having our own set of options asked to avoid that trouble?

so a dhclient.conf that would have an include statement on the standard dhclient.conf ?

Thoughts?

BTW, I fixed this issue on my side by having dhclient.conf just rename the classless-static-route option to rfc3442-classless-static-routes.