Why is adding it to the "last interface" correct. Wouldn't it be more correct to attach routes to the interface that contains that route?
Eg, in your above scenario, bond0 is getting 100.99.4.3/24 thus things that use the 100.99.4.254 as the gateway should be attached to bond0?
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 5:59 PM, Gábor Mészáros < <email address hidden>> wrote:
> ** Attachment added: "50-cloud-init.cfg" > https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1758919/+attachment/ > 5091207/+files/50-cloud-init.cfg > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical > Field Critical, which is subscribed to the bug report. > Matching subscriptions: juju bugs > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1758919 > > Title: > static routes get lost when lxd container being deployed [MAAS > environment] > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1758919/+subscriptions >
Why is adding it to the "last interface" correct. Wouldn't it be more
correct to attach routes to the interface that contains that route?
Eg, in your above scenario, bond0 is getting 100.99.4.3/24 thus things that
use the 100.99.4.254 as the gateway should be attached to bond0?
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 5:59 PM, Gábor Mészáros <
<email address hidden>> wrote:
> ** Attachment added: "50-cloud-init.cfg" /bugs.launchpad .net/juju/ +bug/1758919/ +attachment/ +files/ 50-cloud- init.cfg /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 1758919 /bugs.launchpad .net/juju/ +bug/1758919/ +subscriptions
> https:/
> 5091207/
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical
> Field Critical, which is subscribed to the bug report.
> Matching subscriptions: juju bugs
> https:/
>
> Title:
> static routes get lost when lxd container being deployed [MAAS
> environment]
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https:/
>