Cinder

project/tenant id not in VolumeBackup

Bug #1554102 reported by Steve McLellan
10
This bug affects 2 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Cinder
Invalid
High
Unassigned

Bug Description

Using the v2 API, both volumes and snapshots include as part of their response the tenant/project id. In the case of volumes it's under the 'os-vol-tenant-attr:tenant_id' attribute, and with snapshots, the 'os-extended-snapshot-attributes:project_id' attribute. Backups don't appear to have this information at all, nor is it possible to calculate it in some cases because backups exist independent of the volume they were created from (even if it's deleted).

My use case for this is to enable indexing for searchlight but more generally it makes the admin all_tenants search option much less useful without knowing who owns a particular backup.

Tags: bugsmash
Duncan Thomas (duncan-thomas)
Changed in cinder:
importance: Undecided → High
Duncan Thomas (duncan-thomas)
Changed in cinder:
status: New → Confirmed
assignee: nobody → Duncan Thomas (duncan-thomas)
Revision history for this message
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote : Fix proposed to cinder (master)

Fix proposed to branch: master
Review: https://review.openstack.org/289658

Changed in cinder:
status: Confirmed → In Progress
Matt Smith (mss-4)
tags: added: bugsmash
Changed in cinder:
assignee: Duncan Thomas (duncan-thomas) → nobody
status: In Progress → New
Revision history for this message
wangxiyuan (wangxiyuan) wrote :

I'll follow Duncan's patch later.

Changed in cinder:
assignee: nobody → wangxiyuan (wangxiyuan)
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack)
Changed in cinder:
status: New → In Progress
Revision history for this message
wangxiyuan (wangxiyuan) wrote :

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/258374 already fixed this bug.

Changed in cinder:
assignee: wangxiyuan (wangxiyuan) → nobody
status: In Progress → Invalid
Revision history for this message
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote : Change abandoned on cinder (master)

Change abandoned by Sean McGinnis (<email address hidden>) on branch: master
Review: https://review.openstack.org/289658
Reason: Functionality has already been implemented.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.
Subscribing...

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.