Comment 11 for bug 1289931

Revision history for this message
Duncan Thomas (duncan-thomas) wrote :

> Cinder has no place in that area, it should simply be an iSCSI handling API and kept simple.
> If there is any hardware backend which does not support compatible iSCSI commands and
> protocol, and for which I can't think off the top of my head as its likely impossible, it
> should be the driver implementation which either ignores that request or returns an error.

We decided some time ago that for cinder to go down that road lies madness. If a driver can't support all of the core features, we don't merge it.