Activity log for bug #1762587

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2018-04-10 01:21:31 William Hankard bug added bug
2018-04-10 06:58:16 Frode Nordahl charm-keystone-ldap: importance Undecided Wishlist
2018-04-10 06:58:20 Frode Nordahl charm-keystone-ldap: status New Triaged
2021-11-18 18:33:18 Vern Hart bug added subscriber Vern Hart
2021-11-18 19:48:18 Vern Hart attachment added keystone-ldap.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-keystone-ldap/+bug/1762587/+attachment/5541874/+files/keystone-ldap.patch
2022-06-22 00:37:17 Samuel Allan charm-keystone-ldap: assignee Samuel Walladge (swalladge)
2022-06-22 00:37:20 Samuel Allan charm-keystone-ldap: status Triaged In Progress
2022-06-24 02:35:49 Nobuto Murata description When using the keystone-ldap charm to deploy against an ldap server, the ldap-user and ldap-password are required fields. In instances where no credentials are needed like in an anonymous bind situation one needs to populate dummy data in these fields for the charm to be unblocked for the deployment to proceed. To have keystone query an ldap directory the ldap-user and ldap-password is not needed to successfully bind to the directory. Would it be possible to introduce a feature for using anonymous bind. Thank you When using the keystone-ldap charm to deploy against an ldap server, the ldap-user and ldap-password are required fields. In instances where no credentials are needed like in an anonymous bind situation one needs to populate dummy data in these fields for the charm to be unblocked for the deployment to proceed. To have keystone query an ldap directory the ldap-user and ldap-password is not needed to successfully bind to the directory. Would it be possible to introduce a feature for using anonymous bind. Thank you Anonymous bind is supported since Ocata: https://review.opendev.org/#/q/I193c9537c107092e48f7ea1d25ff9c17f872c15b
2022-07-01 08:08:55 OpenStack Infra charm-keystone-ldap: status In Progress Fix Committed
2023-03-29 13:36:33 OpenStack Infra tags in-stable-yoga