No way to specify a common volume_backend_name across multiple backends
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
OpenStack Cinder-Ceph charm |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Nobuto Murata |
Bug Description
OpenStack actually allows setting the same volume_backend_name across multiple storage backends.
https:/
However, the charm takes the approach to set it from the application name in Juju. So at this moment, the same name for volume_backend_name cannot be set since Juju doesn't allow the same application in the model. Would be nice to pass an arbitrary volume_backend_name through a charm config.
[cinder-ceph-c1]
volume_backend_name = cinder-ceph-c1
volume_driver = cinder.
rbd_pool = cinder-ceph-c1
rbd_user = cinder-ceph-c1
rbd_secret_uuid = b0ff5b30-
rbd_ceph_conf = /var/lib/
report_
rbd_exclusive_
rbd_flatten_
[cinder-ceph-c2]
volume_backend_name = cinder-ceph-c2
volume_driver = cinder.
rbd_pool = cinder-ceph-c2
rbd_user = cinder-ceph-c2
rbd_secret_uuid = 0afd2211-
rbd_ceph_conf = /var/lib/
report_
rbd_exclusive_
rbd_flatten_
Changed in charm-cinder-ceph: | |
assignee: | nobody → Nobuto Murata (nobuto) |
assignee: | Nobuto Murata (nobuto) → nobody |
Changed in charm-cinder-ceph: | |
assignee: | nobody → Nobuto Murata (nobuto) |
Changed in charm-cinder-ceph: | |
milestone: | none → 21.10 |
Changed in charm-cinder-ceph: | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
Fix proposed to branch: master /review. opendev. org/737506
Review: https:/