| 2015-02-07 08:06:26 |
ZhiQiang Fan |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2015-02-07 08:06:34 |
ZhiQiang Fan |
ceilometer: assignee |
|
ZhiQiang Fan (aji-zqfan) |
|
| 2015-02-07 08:07:17 |
ZhiQiang Fan |
description |
no matter what ttl is, the code:
https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/926f781096dcfa77a8f63e403c0959de20e182aa/ceilometer/storage/impl_sqlalchemy.py#L362
for table in [models.MetaText, models.MetaBigInt,
models.MetaFloat, models.MetaBool]:
(session.query(table)
.join(sample_subq, sample_subq.c.id == table.id)
.delete())
will clean the four table, then metadata query for resource api will no longer works
sample id is message_id, metada id is resource id, compare them is non sense
we should clean metadata for those cleaned resource, not samples |
no matter what ttl is, the code:
https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/926f781096dcfa77a8f63e403c0959de20e182aa/ceilometer/storage/impl_sqlalchemy.py#L362
for table in [models.MetaText, models.MetaBigInt,
models.MetaFloat, models.MetaBool]:
(session.query(table)
.join(sample_subq, sample_subq.c.id == table.id)
.delete())
will clean all the data in the four tables, then metadata query for resource api will no longer works
sample id is message_id, metada id is resource id, compare them is non sense
we should clean metadata for those cleaned resource, not samples |
|
| 2015-02-07 14:21:50 |
ZhiQiang Fan |
description |
no matter what ttl is, the code:
https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/926f781096dcfa77a8f63e403c0959de20e182aa/ceilometer/storage/impl_sqlalchemy.py#L362
for table in [models.MetaText, models.MetaBigInt,
models.MetaFloat, models.MetaBool]:
(session.query(table)
.join(sample_subq, sample_subq.c.id == table.id)
.delete())
will clean all the data in the four tables, then metadata query for resource api will no longer works
sample id is message_id, metada id is resource id, compare them is non sense
we should clean metadata for those cleaned resource, not samples |
no matter what ttl is, the code:
https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/926f781096dcfa77a8f63e403c0959de20e182aa/ceilometer/storage/impl_sqlalchemy.py#L362
for table in [models.MetaText, models.MetaBigInt,
models.MetaFloat, models.MetaBool]:
(session.query(table)
.join(sample_subq, sample_subq.c.id == table.id)
.delete())
will clean all the data in the four tables, then metadata query for resource api will no longer works
sample id is primary index generated by sql, metada id is resource internal_id, compare them is non sense
we should clean metadata for those cleaned resource, not samples |
|
| 2015-02-09 01:15:15 |
OpenStack Infra |
ceilometer: status |
New |
In Progress |
|
| 2015-02-09 22:16:32 |
Karolyn Chambers |
tags |
|
juno-backport-potential |
|
| 2015-02-10 09:20:01 |
OpenStack Infra |
ceilometer: status |
In Progress |
Fix Committed |
|
| 2015-02-10 11:02:52 |
Eoghan Glynn |
ceilometer: milestone |
|
kilo-3 |
|
| 2015-02-10 11:02:57 |
Eoghan Glynn |
ceilometer: importance |
Undecided |
High |
|
| 2015-03-19 13:49:57 |
Thierry Carrez |
ceilometer: status |
Fix Committed |
Fix Released |
|
| 2015-04-30 09:01:07 |
Thierry Carrez |
ceilometer: milestone |
kilo-3 |
2015.1.0 |
|
| 2015-05-14 22:47:53 |
OpenStack Infra |
tags |
juno-backport-potential |
in-stable-juno juno-backport-potential |
|
| 2015-11-14 10:31:24 |
Alan Pevec |
nominated for series |
|
ceilometer/juno |
|
| 2015-11-14 10:31:24 |
Alan Pevec |
bug task added |
|
ceilometer/juno |
|
| 2015-11-14 15:03:48 |
Alan Pevec |
ceilometer/juno: status |
New |
Fix Committed |
|
| 2015-11-14 15:03:48 |
Alan Pevec |
ceilometer/juno: milestone |
|
2014.2.4 |
|
| 2015-11-19 21:39:42 |
Alan Pevec |
ceilometer/juno: status |
Fix Committed |
Fix Released |
|
