RevisionTree.iter_changes(WT) should be as fast as WT.iter_changes(RevTree)
Bug #760969 reported by
John A Meinel
This bug affects 1 person
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bazaar |
Confirmed
|
Medium
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Right now our InterDirStateTree optimizer only thinks it is compatible if you use WT.iter_
iter_changes is symmetric. So even if we can't easily change the _process_entry logic, we can just swap the trees, call iter_changes() then reverse the output.