Confusing 'bzr reconfigure' target: --branch/--tree vs 'bzr branch'
Bug #667448 reported by
Lluís Vilanova
This bug affects 1 person
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bazaar |
Confirmed
|
Low
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
I think the '--branch' target type in 'bzr reconfigure' would be more intuitive if it produced the results now found in 'bzr reconfigure --tree', so that then it would match the behaviour in 'bzr branch'.
Revision history for this message
| Martin Pool (mbp) wrote | #1 |
| Changed in bzr: | |
| importance: | Undecided → Low |
| status: | New → Confirmed |
| tags: |
added: confuing-ui removed: doc |
| tags: | added: reconfigure |
| tags: | added: check-for-breezy |
To post a comment you must log in.
I don't think we should change the meaning of an existing option, but there is something confusing there. Perhaps --branch should be removed in favour of --no-tree --unbound (unless it does something else).