Confusing 'bzr reconfigure' target: --branch/--tree vs 'bzr branch'

Bug #667448 reported by Lluís Vilanova on 2010-10-27
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone

Bug Description

I think the '--branch' target type in 'bzr reconfigure' would be more intuitive if it produced the results now found in 'bzr reconfigure --tree', so that then it would match the behaviour in 'bzr branch'.

Martin Pool (mbp) wrote :

I don't think we should change the meaning of an existing option, but there is something confusing there. Perhaps --branch should be removed in favour of --no-tree --unbound (unless it does something else).

Changed in bzr:
importance: Undecided → Low
status: New → Confirmed
tags: added: confuing-ui
removed: doc
tags: added: reconfigure
Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer) on 2017-11-09
tags: added: check-for-breezy
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  Edit
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Related questions