impact of is_ignored on mutabletree.smart_add should be checked
Bug #607258 reported by
Parth Malwankar
on 2010-07-19
This bug affects 1 person
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bazaar |
Medium
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Based on John's comment on https:/
the impact of is_ignored on mutabletree.
Quote:
> I may be over-concerned, but I do believe that 'is_ignored()' is a fair
> amount of overhead in the 'initial add of 30k files', and I'd like us to
> at least be aware of it. I do wonder about changing the internals so
> that instead of using '?:.*/)?(?!.*/)) to filter out everything but the
> basename for some patterns, if we wouldn't be better off knowing
> that this is a basename-only pattern and just supply that to the match.
Parth Malwankar (parthm)
on 2010-07-19
tags: | added: performance |
Changed in bzr: | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
status: | New → Confirmed |
Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer)
on 2017-11-09
tags: | added: check-for-breezy |
To post a comment you must log in.