2009/8/12 Jelmer Vernooij <email address hidden>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Vincent Ladeuil wrote:
>> Please consider making it based on the directory name instead of
>> the plugin name so that it can also be used to allow testing
>> various branches of the same plugin.
>>
>> Of course a single directory can be allowed for a given plugin and
>> there may be some trickery involved when mapping the directory to
>> the python namespace (I'm not familiar with the plugin loading code
>> so I may be wrong).
> I submitted a merge request for this earlier attempting to work
> towards this but it was rejected:
>
> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~jelmer/bzr/plugin-refactor/+merge/9005
We should talk about that more then, but probably not in this bug.
Aside from some detailed comments by Robert he just says "it doesn't
seem like a good conceptual idea", but I'm not sure it's a bad idea.
2009/8/12 Jelmer Vernooij <email address hidden>: /code.edge. launchpad. net/~jelmer/ bzr/plugin- refactor/ +merge/ 9005
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Vincent Ladeuil wrote:
>> Please consider making it based on the directory name instead of
>> the plugin name so that it can also be used to allow testing
>> various branches of the same plugin.
>>
>> Of course a single directory can be allowed for a given plugin and
>> there may be some trickery involved when mapping the directory to
>> the python namespace (I'm not familiar with the plugin loading code
>> so I may be wrong).
> I submitted a merge request for this earlier attempting to work
> towards this but it was rejected:
>
> https:/
We should talk about that more then, but probably not in this bug.
Aside from some detailed comments by Robert he just says "it doesn't
seem like a good conceptual idea", but I'm not sure it's a bad idea.
-- launchpad. net/~mbp/>
Martin <http://