-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Frits Jalvingh wrote: > Ok, the huge amount of texts is horribly clear. Just for info, the > repository one month ago, before moving to bzr 1.16 (revno 1292) has the > following stats: > > jal@mabillon:~/vp-1292$ bzr repository-details > Commits: 6408 > Raw % Compressed % Objects > Revisions: 3463 KiB 0% 2534 KiB 1% 6408 > Inventories: 19270232 KiB 95% 25390 KiB 11% 6408 > Texts: 848675 KiB 4% 185519 KiB 86% 51993 > Signatures: 0 KiB 0% 0 KiB 0% 0 > Total: 20122370 KiB 100% 213445 KiB 100% 64809 > > So somehow the #of texts has increased from 51993 to a horrible > 812257.. Quite an increase. This increase seems to be in some 400 > revisions so: (812257-51993)/400=1900 delta files per revision if i'm > correct? Quite steep, that. > I don't have any idea why 1.16 would be causing something like this. Are you sure something didn't change inside your process? Anyway, yes. The closest from your earlier postings is: > Commits: 6622 > Raw % Compressed % Objects > Revisions: 3573 KiB 0% 2617 KiB 0% 6622 > Inventories: 19979626 KiB 84% 55881 KiB 16% 6622 > Texts: 3722632 KiB 15% 288029 KiB 83% 388846 so 6622 - 6408 = 214 revisions, and 388,846 - 51,993 = 336,853 / 214 = 1,574 changes per revision. And then on to: > Commits: 7328 > Raw % Compressed % Objects > Revisions: 3928 KiB 0% 2885 KiB 0% 7328 > Inventories: 21695982 KiB 70% 108661 KiB 19% 7328 > Texts: 9040343 KiB 29% 453880 KiB 80% 1017118 (1017118 - 388846) / (7328 - 6622) = 628,272 / 706 = 889 Also, you can note that your "inventories" size went from: 19,270,232 to 19,979,626 to 21,696,982 Which doesn't look like it is increasing by much overall. (So it wouldn't seem that you are adding a lot of new files.) But the "compressed" size went from 25MB to 108MB, or almost 4x growth, indicating that it thinks you have a lot of new entries. Now, it is also possible that we have a bug. For example, what if 'heads()' was giving incorrect information, and causing us to generate a new revision for texts that didn't actually need it. That would also point to a lot of the other issues you've been seeing. Certainly it is worth investigating. Though I'd also be curious as to why we haven't been seeing this with other projects. John =:-> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkqA7z8ACgkQJdeBCYSNAAOUlACeOlDEuidCN7AAf8gLiRVJMrE3 t6MAnjS4RNMs6XfD/ui9kqHFqjGR8E36 =fbOy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----