On 7 August 2010 05:01, John A Meinel <email address hidden> wrote: > We can now set the output via a configuration option. Though I guess we > also want another bug about not being able to set this on the command > line?
Yes, that'd be covered by bug 491196. -- Martin
On 7 August 2010 05:01, John A Meinel <email address hidden> wrote:
> We can now set the output via a configuration option. Though I guess we
> also want another bug about not being able to set this on the command
> line?
Yes, that'd be covered by bug 491196.
--
Martin