Comment 4 for bug 320119

I think (possibly changing my mind here) that changing log would also
potentially be ok. I think bzr's current behaviour is consistent with
svn, which is only a weak reason to keep it, but if it's inconsistent
it'd be another reason to change it.

Can you think of any cases where making log non-inclusive would be annoying except for being a change in current behaviour?

I can see how it is confusing that eg log -r10..20 doesn't show you
what merge -r10..20 will merge.