| 2007-06-19 16:10:15 |
Andrew Bennetts |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2007-06-19 20:17:06 |
John A Meinel |
bzr: status |
Unconfirmed |
Confirmed |
|
| 2007-06-19 20:17:06 |
John A Meinel |
bzr: importance |
Undecided |
Wishlist |
|
| 2007-06-19 20:17:06 |
John A Meinel |
bzr: statusexplanation |
|
This really should be a mailing list discussion, not a bug report discussion.
I think it would be reasonable to switch to ssh://, there is some ambiguity because of foreign branch support, but no more than svn+http:// et al.
We already use the 'netloc' hack, because we have sftp:// and http+urllib:// and bzr+ssh:// and a lot of other URL protocols and 'netloc' seems extra restrictive about what it will consider using the user@host portion. (We wrap it into a function of bzrlib.transport.register_urlparse_netloc_protocol, which does a double-register check.)
I would prefer for us to continue using "proto://user@host/absolute/path/" for the time being, we can do "proto:user@host" though that causes problems if you ever have paths that genuinely contain a ":" character. On Windows you end up with "C:/", though we can detect that as a single character "protocol" when running on a windows variant (cygwin?).
|
|
| 2008-01-21 04:13:39 |
Martin Pool |
title |
Change "bzr+ssh://" URLs to "ssh://" |
Change "bzr+ssh://" URLs to "ssh://" and accept "user@host" |
|
| 2009-03-03 22:02:19 |
Martin Pool |
title |
Change "bzr+ssh://" URLs to "ssh://" and accept "user@host" |
Change "bzr+ssh://" URLs to "ssh://" |
|
| 2009-03-03 22:05:56 |
Martin Pool |
title |
Change "bzr+ssh://" URLs to "ssh://" |
Accept "ssh://" as a shortcut for "bzr+ssh://" URLs |
|
| 2017-11-09 00:41:25 |
Jelmer Vernooij |
tags |
|
check-for-breezy |
|
| 2018-03-30 04:00:11 |
Jelmer Vernooij |
bug task added |
|
brz |
|
| 2018-03-30 04:00:22 |
Jelmer Vernooij |
tags |
check-for-breezy |
ssh ui |
|
| 2018-03-30 04:00:28 |
Jelmer Vernooij |
brz: status |
New |
Triaged |
|
| 2018-03-30 04:00:30 |
Jelmer Vernooij |
brz: importance |
Undecided |
Low |
|
