On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 11:31 +0000, James Westby wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 11:03 +0000, Vincent Ladeuil wrote:
> > James, any feedback on this ? It doesn't seem to have landed...
>
> I was sure that I updated the branch, had it approved, and submitted
> it, but I can't find any evidence of that now. I'll see if I at least
> did the first part.
I think
revno: 4109 [merge]
committer: Canonical.com Patch Queue Manager <email address hidden>
branch nick: +trunk
timestamp: Wed 2009-03-11 01:17:43 +0000
message:
(jamesw) Improve the help topic and errors around --fixes.
is it, though I can't find any evidence of it in the mailing list
archives.
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 11:31 +0000, James Westby wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 11:03 +0000, Vincent Ladeuil wrote:
> > James, any feedback on this ? It doesn't seem to have landed...
>
> I was sure that I updated the branch, had it approved, and submitted
> it, but I can't find any evidence of that now. I'll see if I at least
> did the first part.
I think
revno: 4109 [merge]
committer: Canonical.com Patch Queue Manager <email address hidden>
branch nick: +trunk
timestamp: Wed 2009-03-11 01:17:43 +0000
message:
(jamesw) Improve the help topic and errors around --fixes.
is it, though I can't find any evidence of it in the mailing list
archives.
Thanks,
James