CVE 2011-4086
The journal_
Related bugs and status
CVE-2011-4086 (Candidate) is related to these bugs:
Bug #796030: intel gma 4500mhd external monitor picture scrambled
Summary | In | Importance | Status | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
796030 | intel gma 4500mhd external monitor picture scrambled | linux (Ubuntu) | Medium | Fix Released | ||
796030 | intel gma 4500mhd external monitor picture scrambled | Gentoo Linux | Undecided | New | ||
796030 | intel gma 4500mhd external monitor picture scrambled | linux (Ubuntu Natty) | Medium | Fix Released | ||
796030 | intel gma 4500mhd external monitor picture scrambled | linux (Ubuntu Oneiric) | Medium | Fix Released | ||
796030 | intel gma 4500mhd external monitor picture scrambled | linux (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Fix Released |
Bug #929781: CVE-2011-4086
Summary | In | Importance | Status | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Lucid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Lucid) | Medium | Fix Released | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Lucid) | Medium | Fix Released | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Fix Released | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Quantal) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Quantal) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Quantal) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Raring) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Raring) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Raring) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Saucy) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Saucy) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Saucy) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-raring (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-raring (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Trusty) | Undecided | New | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Trusty) | Undecided | New | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Trusty) | Undecided | New | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-raring (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Utopic) | Undecided | Won't Fix | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Utopic) | Undecided | Won't Fix | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Utopic) | Undecided | Won't Fix | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Vivid) | Undecided | New | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Vivid) | Undecided | New | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Vivid) | Undecided | New | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-raring (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-raring (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
929781 | CVE-2011-4086 | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid |
Bug #947997: CVE-2012-1090
Summary | In | Importance | Status | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux (Ubuntu) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux (Ubuntu Precise) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Precise) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Precise) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Precise) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Precise) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Precise) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Precise) | Low | Fix Released | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Lucid) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Lucid) | Low | Fix Released | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Lucid) | Low | Fix Released | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Precise) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Precise) | Low | Fix Released | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Quantal) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Quantal) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Quantal) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu Precise) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Raring) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Raring) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Raring) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Saucy) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Saucy) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Saucy) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-raring (Ubuntu) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-raring (Ubuntu Precise) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux (Ubuntu Trusty) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Trusty) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Trusty) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Trusty) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Trusty) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Trusty) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Trusty) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu Trusty) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-raring (Ubuntu Trusty) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Trusty) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Trusty) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-saucy (Ubuntu) | Undecided | New | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-saucy (Ubuntu Precise) | Undecided | Won't Fix | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-saucy (Ubuntu Trusty) | Undecided | New | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Utopic) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Utopic) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Utopic) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux (Ubuntu Vivid) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Vivid) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Vivid) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Vivid) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Vivid) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Vivid) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Vivid) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu Vivid) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-raring (Ubuntu Vivid) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-saucy (Ubuntu Vivid) | Undecided | Won't Fix | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Vivid) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Vivid) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu Precise) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu Trusty) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu Vivid) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-utopic (Ubuntu) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-utopic (Ubuntu Precise) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-utopic (Ubuntu Trusty) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-lts-utopic (Ubuntu Vivid) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-goldfish (Ubuntu) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-goldfish (Ubuntu Precise) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-goldfish (Ubuntu Trusty) | Low | Invalid | ||
947997 | CVE-2012-1090 | linux-goldfish (Ubuntu Vivid) | Low | Invalid |
Bug #949311: [PATCH] Fn+F* keys don't work on MSI Wind U100Plus since Ubuntu 10.04
Summary | In | Importance | Status | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
949311 | [PATCH] Fn+F* keys don't work on MSI Wind U100Plus since Ubuntu 10.04 | linux (Ubuntu) | Medium | Fix Released | ||
949311 | [PATCH] Fn+F* keys don't work on MSI Wind U100Plus since Ubuntu 10.04 | linux (Ubuntu Natty) | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
949311 | [PATCH] Fn+F* keys don't work on MSI Wind U100Plus since Ubuntu 10.04 | linux (Ubuntu Oneiric) | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
949311 | [PATCH] Fn+F* keys don't work on MSI Wind U100Plus since Ubuntu 10.04 | linux (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Fix Released |
Bug #963685: CVE-2012-4398
Summary | In | Importance | Status | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux (Ubuntu) | Medium | Fix Released | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Fix Released | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Won't Fix | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Lucid) | Medium | Fix Released | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Oneiric) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Lucid) | Medium | Fix Released | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Oneiric) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Lucid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Oneiric) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Fix Released | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Quantal) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Quantal) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Quantal) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Hardy) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Hardy) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Hardy) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Raring) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Raring) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Raring) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Saucy) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Saucy) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Saucy) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Fix Released | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-saucy (Ubuntu) | Undecided | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-raring (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-raring (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-raring (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Utopic) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Utopic) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Utopic) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Fix Released | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-raring (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-saucy (Ubuntu Vivid) | Undecided | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-utopic (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-lts-utopic (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-goldfish (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-goldfish (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-flo (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
963685 | CVE-2012-4398 | linux-flo (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid |
Bug #968233: linux: disable_nx should not be in __cpuinitdata section for X86_32
Summary | In | Importance | Status | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
968233 | linux: disable_nx should not be in __cpuinitdata section for X86_32 | linux (Ubuntu) | Medium | Fix Released | ||
968233 | linux: disable_nx should not be in __cpuinitdata section for X86_32 | linux (Ubuntu Oneiric) | Medium | Fix Released | ||
968233 | linux: disable_nx should not be in __cpuinitdata section for X86_32 | linux (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Fix Released | ||
968233 | linux: disable_nx should not be in __cpuinitdata section for X86_32 | linux (Ubuntu Natty) | Medium | Fix Released |
Bug #969309: WARNING: drivers/video/vesafb.o(.exit.text+0x4a): Section mismatch in reference from the function
Summary | In | Importance | Status | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
969309 | WARNING: drivers/video/vesafb.o(.exit.text+0x4a): Section mismatch in reference from the function | linux (Ubuntu) | Medium | Fix Released | ||
969309 | WARNING: drivers/video/vesafb.o(.exit.text+0x4a): Section mismatch in reference from the function | linux (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Fix Released | ||
969309 | WARNING: drivers/video/vesafb.o(.exit.text+0x4a): Section mismatch in reference from the function | linux (Ubuntu Oneiric) | Medium | Fix Released | ||
969309 | WARNING: drivers/video/vesafb.o(.exit.text+0x4a): Section mismatch in reference from the function | linux (Ubuntu Natty) | Medium | Fix Released | ||
969309 | WARNING: drivers/video/vesafb.o(.exit.text+0x4a): Section mismatch in reference from the function | linux (Ubuntu Lucid) | Medium | Fix Released |
Bug #971685: CVE-2012-1601
Summary | In | Importance | Status | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Fix Released | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Fix Released | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Lucid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Lucid) | Medium | Fix Released | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Lucid) | Medium | Fix Released | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Fix Released | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Quantal) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Quantal) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Quantal) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Raring) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Raring) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Raring) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Saucy) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Saucy) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Saucy) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-raring (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-raring (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Trusty) | Undecided | New | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Trusty) | Undecided | New | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Trusty) | Undecided | New | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-raring (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Utopic) | Undecided | Won't Fix | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Utopic) | Undecided | Won't Fix | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Utopic) | Undecided | Won't Fix | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Vivid) | Undecided | New | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Vivid) | Undecided | New | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Vivid) | Undecided | New | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-raring (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-raring (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
971685 | CVE-2012-1601 | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid |
Bug #984757: CVE-2012-2100
Summary | In | Importance | Status | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux (Ubuntu) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux (Ubuntu Precise) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Precise) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Precise) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Precise) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Precise) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Precise) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Precise) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Lucid) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Lucid) | Low | Fix Released | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Lucid) | Low | Fix Released | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Precise) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Precise) | Low | Fix Released | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Quantal) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Quantal) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Quantal) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu Precise) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Raring) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Raring) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Raring) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Saucy) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Saucy) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Saucy) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-raring (Ubuntu) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-raring (Ubuntu Precise) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu Precise) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux (Ubuntu Trusty) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Trusty) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Trusty) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Trusty) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Trusty) | Undecided | New | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Trusty) | Undecided | New | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Trusty) | Undecided | New | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu Trusty) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-raring (Ubuntu Trusty) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu Trusty) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Trusty) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Trusty) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Utopic) | Undecided | Won't Fix | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Utopic) | Undecided | Won't Fix | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Utopic) | Undecided | Won't Fix | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux (Ubuntu Vivid) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Vivid) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Vivid) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Vivid) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Vivid) | Undecided | New | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Vivid) | Undecided | New | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Vivid) | Undecided | New | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu Vivid) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-raring (Ubuntu Vivid) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu Vivid) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Vivid) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Vivid) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux (Ubuntu Wily) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Wily) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Wily) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Wily) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Wily) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Wily) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Wily) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu Wily) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-raring (Ubuntu Wily) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu Wily) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Wily) | Low | Invalid | ||
984757 | CVE-2012-2100 | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Wily) | Low | Invalid |
Bug #987281: linux: 2.6.38-15.59 -proposed tracker
Summary | In | Importance | Status | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
987281 | linux: 2.6.38-15.59 -proposed tracker | linux (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987281 | linux: 2.6.38-15.59 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
987281 | linux: 2.6.38-15.59 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow certification-testing | Undecided | Invalid | ||
987281 | linux: 2.6.38-15.59 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow prepare-package | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
987281 | linux: 2.6.38-15.59 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow prepare-package-lbm | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
987281 | linux: 2.6.38-15.59 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow prepare-package-meta | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
987281 | linux: 2.6.38-15.59 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow promote-to-proposed | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
987281 | linux: 2.6.38-15.59 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow promote-to-security | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
987281 | linux: 2.6.38-15.59 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow promote-to-updates | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
987281 | linux: 2.6.38-15.59 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow regression-testing | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
987281 | linux: 2.6.38-15.59 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow security-signoff | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
987281 | linux: 2.6.38-15.59 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow verification-testing | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
987281 | linux: 2.6.38-15.59 -proposed tracker | linux (Ubuntu Natty) | Undecided | Fix Released |
Bug #987571: CVE-2012-2123
Summary | In | Importance | Status | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux (Ubuntu) | Medium | Fix Released | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Fix Released | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Fix Released | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Lucid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Lucid) | Medium | Fix Released | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Lucid) | Medium | Fix Released | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Fix Released | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Quantal) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Quantal) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Quantal) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Raring) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Raring) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Raring) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Saucy) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Saucy) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Saucy) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-raring (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-raring (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Trusty) | Undecided | New | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Trusty) | Undecided | New | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Trusty) | Undecided | New | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-raring (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Utopic) | Undecided | Won't Fix | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Utopic) | Undecided | Won't Fix | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Utopic) | Undecided | Won't Fix | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Vivid) | Undecided | New | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Vivid) | Undecided | New | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Vivid) | Undecided | New | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-raring (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Fix Released | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-raring (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
987571 | CVE-2012-2123 | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid |
Bug #989988: linux: 2.6.24-31.101 -proposed tracker
Summary | In | Importance | Status | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
989988 | linux: 2.6.24-31.101 -proposed tracker | linux (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
989988 | linux: 2.6.24-31.101 -proposed tracker | linux (Ubuntu Hardy) | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
989988 | linux: 2.6.24-31.101 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
989988 | linux: 2.6.24-31.101 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow certification-testing | Undecided | Invalid | ||
989988 | linux: 2.6.24-31.101 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow prepare-package | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
989988 | linux: 2.6.24-31.101 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow prepare-package-lbm | Undecided | Invalid | ||
989988 | linux: 2.6.24-31.101 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow prepare-package-meta | Undecided | Invalid | ||
989988 | linux: 2.6.24-31.101 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow promote-to-proposed | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
989988 | linux: 2.6.24-31.101 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow promote-to-security | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
989988 | linux: 2.6.24-31.101 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow promote-to-updates | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
989988 | linux: 2.6.24-31.101 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow regression-testing | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
989988 | linux: 2.6.24-31.101 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow security-signoff | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
989988 | linux: 2.6.24-31.101 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow verification-testing | Undecided | Fix Released |
Bug #990103: linux: 2.6.32-41.89 -proposed tracker
Summary | In | Importance | Status | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
990103 | linux: 2.6.32-41.89 -proposed tracker | linux (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
990103 | linux: 2.6.32-41.89 -proposed tracker | linux (Ubuntu Lucid) | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
990103 | linux: 2.6.32-41.89 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
990103 | linux: 2.6.32-41.89 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow certification-testing | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
990103 | linux: 2.6.32-41.89 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow prepare-package | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
990103 | linux: 2.6.32-41.89 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow prepare-package-lbm | Undecided | Invalid | ||
990103 | linux: 2.6.32-41.89 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow prepare-package-meta | Undecided | Invalid | ||
990103 | linux: 2.6.32-41.89 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow prepare-package-ports-meta | Undecided | Invalid | ||
990103 | linux: 2.6.32-41.89 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow promote-to-proposed | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
990103 | linux: 2.6.32-41.89 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow promote-to-security | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
990103 | linux: 2.6.32-41.89 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow promote-to-updates | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
990103 | linux: 2.6.32-41.89 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow regression-testing | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
990103 | linux: 2.6.32-41.89 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow security-signoff | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
990103 | linux: 2.6.32-41.89 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow verification-testing | Undecided | Fix Released |
Bug #990206: linux-ti-omap4: 2.6.38-1209.24 -proposed tracker
Summary | In | Importance | Status | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
990206 | linux-ti-omap4: 2.6.38-1209.24 -proposed tracker | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
990206 | linux-ti-omap4: 2.6.38-1209.24 -proposed tracker | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Natty) | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
990206 | linux-ti-omap4: 2.6.38-1209.24 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
990206 | linux-ti-omap4: 2.6.38-1209.24 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow certification-testing | Undecided | Invalid | ||
990206 | linux-ti-omap4: 2.6.38-1209.24 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow prepare-package | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
990206 | linux-ti-omap4: 2.6.38-1209.24 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow prepare-package-meta | Undecided | Invalid | ||
990206 | linux-ti-omap4: 2.6.38-1209.24 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow promote-to-proposed | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
990206 | linux-ti-omap4: 2.6.38-1209.24 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow promote-to-security | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
990206 | linux-ti-omap4: 2.6.38-1209.24 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow promote-to-updates | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
990206 | linux-ti-omap4: 2.6.38-1209.24 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow regression-testing | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
990206 | linux-ti-omap4: 2.6.38-1209.24 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow security-signoff | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
990206 | linux-ti-omap4: 2.6.38-1209.24 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow upload-to-ppa | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
990206 | linux-ti-omap4: 2.6.38-1209.24 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow verification-testing | Undecided | Fix Released |
Bug #990208: linux-lts-backport-natty: 2.6.38-15.59~lucid1 -proposed tracker
Summary | In | Importance | Status | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
990208 | linux-lts-backport-natty: 2.6.38-15.59~lucid1 -proposed tracker | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
990208 | linux-lts-backport-natty: 2.6.38-15.59~lucid1 -proposed tracker | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Lucid) | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
990208 | linux-lts-backport-natty: 2.6.38-15.59~lucid1 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
990208 | linux-lts-backport-natty: 2.6.38-15.59~lucid1 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow certification-testing | Undecided | Invalid | ||
990208 | linux-lts-backport-natty: 2.6.38-15.59~lucid1 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow prepare-package | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
990208 | linux-lts-backport-natty: 2.6.38-15.59~lucid1 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow prepare-package-meta | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
990208 | linux-lts-backport-natty: 2.6.38-15.59~lucid1 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow promote-to-proposed | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
990208 | linux-lts-backport-natty: 2.6.38-15.59~lucid1 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow promote-to-security | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
990208 | linux-lts-backport-natty: 2.6.38-15.59~lucid1 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow promote-to-updates | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
990208 | linux-lts-backport-natty: 2.6.38-15.59~lucid1 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow regression-testing | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
990208 | linux-lts-backport-natty: 2.6.38-15.59~lucid1 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow security-signoff | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
990208 | linux-lts-backport-natty: 2.6.38-15.59~lucid1 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow verification-testing | Undecided | Fix Released |
Bug #991770: linux-ec2: 2.6.32-345.48 -proposed tracker
Summary | In | Importance | Status | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
991770 | linux-ec2: 2.6.32-345.48 -proposed tracker | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
991770 | linux-ec2: 2.6.32-345.48 -proposed tracker | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Lucid) | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
991770 | linux-ec2: 2.6.32-345.48 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
991770 | linux-ec2: 2.6.32-345.48 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow certification-testing | Undecided | Invalid | ||
991770 | linux-ec2: 2.6.32-345.48 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow prepare-package | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
991770 | linux-ec2: 2.6.32-345.48 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow prepare-package-meta | Undecided | Invalid | ||
991770 | linux-ec2: 2.6.32-345.48 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow promote-to-proposed | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
991770 | linux-ec2: 2.6.32-345.48 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow promote-to-security | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
991770 | linux-ec2: 2.6.32-345.48 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow promote-to-updates | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
991770 | linux-ec2: 2.6.32-345.48 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow regression-testing | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
991770 | linux-ec2: 2.6.32-345.48 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow security-signoff | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
991770 | linux-ec2: 2.6.32-345.48 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow upload-to-ppa | Undecided | Fix Released | ||
991770 | linux-ec2: 2.6.32-345.48 -proposed tracker | Kernel SRU Workflow verification-testing | Undecided | Fix Released |
See the
CVE page on Mitre.org
for more details.