Deleted branches should have an appropriate ui tag

[Jorge Castro]

http://jujucharms.com/~imbrandon/oneiric/quickdrop

Brandon says the branch has been gone for weeks.

[Kapil Thangavelu (hazmat)]

Excerpts from Jorge O. Castro's message of 2012-04-16 15:33:34 UTC:
> Public bug reported:
>
> http://jujucharms.com/~imbrandon/oneiric/quickdrop
>
> Brandon says the branch has been gone for weeks.
>
> ** Affects: charmworld
> Importance: Undecided
> Status: New
>

If its still available at the charm store, stands to reason it should be visible
in the browser.

[Kapil Thangavelu (hazmat)]

Excerpts from Kapil Thangavelu's message of 2012-04-22 15:57:08 -0700:
> Excerpts from Jorge O. Castro's message of 2012-04-16 15:33:34 UTC:
> > Public bug reported:
> >
> > http://jujucharms.com/~imbrandon/oneiric/quickdrop
> >
> > Brandon says the branch has been gone for weeks.
> >
> > ** Affects: charmworld
> > Importance: Undecided
> > Status: New
> >
>
>
> If its still available at the charm store, stands to reason it should be visible
> in the browser.

Still its probably worth tagging in the ui appropriately.

[Curtis Hovey (sinzui)]

Any one can learn this case by checking the charm's branch_deleted attribute The value defaults to False, but will be True for this case.