Improve the "groups" attribute

[Francois Degrave]

Hi guys!

As I promised during the community days, here is a feature request for the improvement of the "groups" attribute.

I would be great if "groups" could be used similarly to the "states" attribute, knowing one provides a dictionary instead of just a list of groups (smthg like groups="{'readonly':...}") enabling the possibility to set a field readonly if if the user is in such group, invisible if he is in such other group, etc.

Cheers guys! It was nice to see you during comm. days.

[Amit Parik (amit-parik)]

Hello Francois.

Yes, you have suggested a good improvement.
If we could provide a this type of facilities on group attribute then we will solved more issue of security/access rights.

Please look at the issue lp:969198 which will be solved,If this improvement will done.

This will be become a duplicate of lp:969198 but currently I am not making this as a duplicate. Because you have post a bug report with proper suggestion which will be use of us.

So Currently both bugs are open but take care about this both when one will be fixed because both are affected to each other.

Thanks for the reporting!