nepomukservicestub crashed with SIGSEGV in QObject::~QObject()

Bug #960078 reported by whitedragon75
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
kde-runtime (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Description: Ubuntu precise (development branch)
Release: 12.04

kde-runtime:
  Installato: 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu1
  Candidato: 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu1
  Tabella versione:
 *** 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu1 0
        500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main i386 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: kde-runtime 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-19.30-generic 3.2.11
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-19-generic i686
ApportVersion: 1.94.1-0ubuntu2
Architecture: i386
CrashCounter: 1
Date: Tue Mar 20 08:48:35 2012
Disassembly: => 0x0: Cannot access memory at address 0x0
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nepomukservicestub
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release i386 (20101008)
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/nepomukservicestub nepomukfilewatch
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=it_IT.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x0: Cannot access memory at address 0x0
 PC (0x00000000) not located in a known VMA region (needed executable region)!
SegvReason: executing NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: kde-runtime
StacktraceTop:
 ?? ()
 QObject::~QObject() () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libQtCore.so.4
 QObject::~QObject() () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libQtCore.so.4
 _start ()
Title: nepomukservicestub crashed with SIGSEGV in QObject::~QObject()
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-03-08 (11 days ago)
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

Revision history for this message
whitedragon75 (francesco-gatti75) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #913024, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-i386-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.