FFe: Sync libzip 0.10-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

Bug #959067 reported by Fathi Boudra
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
libzip (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Wishlist
Fathi Boudra

Bug Description

Please sync libzip 0.10-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

Due to ABI changes, it involves a transition.

Changelog entries since current precise version 0.9.3-1:

libzip (0.10-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * New upstream release. (Closes: #647131)
  * Add patches:
    - fix_open_nonarchive_test.patch
    - fix_zipconf_path.patch
  * Update debian/compat: bump to 8.
  * Update debian/rules:
    - build depends on dh-autoreconf.
    - bump debhelper build dependency to 8.0.0.
    - bump Standards-Version to 3.9.0 - no changes needed.
    - rename libzip1 to libzip2 (bump soname).
  * Update debian/rules:
    - use dh with autoreconf.
    - drop override_dh_auto_test.
  * Update debian/*.install files.

 -- Fathi Boudra <email address hidden> Sat, 31 Dec 2011 14:39:13 +0200

Upstream changelog entries since version 0.9.3:

  * Added zip_get_num_files(), deprecated zip_get_num_entries().
  * Better windows support.
  * Support for traditional PKWARE encryption added.
  * Fix opening archives with more than 65535 entries.
  * Fix some memory leaks.
  * Fix cmake build and installation
  * Fix memory leak in error case in zip_open()
  * Fixed CVE-2011-0421 (no security implications though)
  * More documentation.

Fathi Boudra (fboudra)
Changed in libzip (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Micah Gersten (micahg) wrote :

Unsubscribed sponsors until the release team chimes in.

Revision history for this message
Stefano Rivera (stefanor) wrote :

If it involves a transition, how big a transition? Have you tested all the reverse-build-dependencies? Do they build against it? If not, are you going to need help getting them to build? Do at least some of them work?

Can you give some reasons for the transition, rather than just cherry-picking the important bug fixes?

Changed in libzip (Ubuntu):
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Fathi Boudra (fboudra) wrote : Re: [Bug 959067] Re: FFe: Sync libzip 0.10-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

On 19 March 2012 13:33, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> If it involves a transition, how big a transition?

It's isn't too big: 9 packages.

ebook-speaker
ebook-tools
fatrat-unpack
focuswriter
fuse-zip
ideviceinstaller
odt2txt
osgearth
sigrok

> Have you tested all the reverse-build-dependencies?

Yes, you can find it under my ppa:
https://launchpad.net/~fboudra/+archive/ppa/+packages

> Do they build against it? If not, are you going to need help getting them to build? Do at least some of them work?

Yes, 7 of them are rebuilt successfully without changes.
2 packages need to be fixed (ideviceinstaller and fuse-zip).
Patches to fix both packages are provided.

> Can you give some reasons for the transition, rather than just cherry-picking the important bug fixes?

It seemed to me the way to move forward (latest upstream release, not
a lot of changes, synced with Debian).

Revision history for this message
Scott Kitterman (kitterman) wrote :

Seems reasonable to me and only affects Okular (through ebook-tools) in Main. Approved.

Changed in libzip (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → Triaged
Fathi Boudra (fboudra)
Changed in libzip (Ubuntu):
assignee: nobody → Fathi Boudra (fboudra)
status: Triaged → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.