rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in gethostbyname2_r()

Bug #958981 reported by JG
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
rhythmbox (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

For some reason Rhythmbox doubled my library size and then started going through it again to remove all the fake duplicate entries. I restarted the program and the first time I did this it crashed immediately, causing this error.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: rhythmbox 2.96-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-19.30-generic 3.2.11
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-19-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: wl
ApportVersion: 1.94.1-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sun Mar 18 20:33:46 2012
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/rhythmbox
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release amd64 (20111012)
ProcCmdline: rhythmbox
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x7f5b9e662bfe: lock xadd %eax,0x18(%rdi)
 PC (0x7f5b9e662bfe) ok
 source "%eax" ok
 destination "0x18(%rdi)" (0x00000017) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)!
 Stack memory exhausted (SP below stack segment)
SegvReason: writing NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: rhythmbox
StacktraceTop:
 ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 gethostbyname2_r () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
Title: rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in gethostbyname2_r()
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-28 (50 days ago)
UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout floppy lpadmin plugdev sambashare users video

Revision history for this message
JG (jdogzz-g5) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #949771, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.