gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in g_signal_emit_valist()

Bug #953897 reported by James Tunnicliffe
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gnome-panel (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Not sure if this is helpful, but I had just logged in and out of gnome (no effects) and logged into unity (no effects). Loaded up a few applications and tried to maximise Quassel on my second screen (by using drag to maximise, which doesn't work in Unity 2D). Since this happened during login, the real reason for the crash could have been nothing to do with this.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: gnome-panel 1:3.3.91-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-18.29-generic 3.2.9
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-18-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 1.94.1-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Mar 13 10:29:58 2012
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-panel
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Alpha amd64 (20120309)
ProcCmdline: gnome-panel
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_GB:en
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x7f96a4b5ee85: mov 0x78(%rax),%edx
 PC (0x7f96a4b5ee85) ok
 source "0x78(%rax)" (0xaaaaaaaaaaaaab22) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)!
 destination "%edx" ok
SegvReason: reading unknown VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: gnome-panel
StacktraceTop:
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 g_signal_emit_valist () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 g_signal_emit () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
Title: gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in g_signal_emit_valist()
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-03-12 (1 days ago)
UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo

Revision history for this message
James Tunnicliffe (dooferlad) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #948667, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.