double-foliation function labels both recto and verso numbers on the same image

Bug #951431 reported by Ralf Claussnitzer
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Goobi.Production
Fix Released
High
Unassigned
1.7
Fix Released
High
Unassigned

Bug Description

This pagination is impossible, because recto and verso sides of individual pages don't get scanned into a single image:

1: 1r 1v
2: 2r 2v
(wrong)

Correct pagination looks like:
2: 1r
3: 1v 2r
4: 2v 3r
(correct)

Here, the front (recto) of page 1 has been scanned to image 2, whereas the back (verso) is on image 3, followed by the front of page 2.

Furthermore, this pagination feature isn't called 'double-foliation' but 'foliation recto/verso'. This should be fixed as well.

Tags: pagination

Related branches

Revision history for this message
Ralf Claussnitzer (ralf-claussnitzer-deactivatedaccount) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Ralf Claussnitzer (ralf-claussnitzer-deactivatedaccount) wrote :

> Furthermore, this pagination feature isn't called 'double-foliation' but
> 'foliation recto/verso'. This should be fixed as well.

To be fixed in another bug.

Revision history for this message
Ralf Claussnitzer (ralf-claussnitzer-deactivatedaccount) wrote :

Double-foliation always count verso/recto:
1v 2r
2v 3r
...

There is no single recto label (1r) as stated in the bug description.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.