Ubuntu
evince package

Cannot reduce the sidebar width with the specific ebook

Bug #933557 reported by l0co on 2012-02-16

This bug report is a duplicate of: Bug #704232: can´t resize side pane. Edit Remove

This bug affects 1 person

Affects		Status	Importance	Assigned to	Milestone
	evince (Ubuntu)	New	Undecided	Unassigned

Bug Description

With the specific ebook I have currently opened in the evince, I changed the width of sidebar by drag and drop, and can't now reduce the width back using the same method (only extending works, reducing - no).

This doesn't happen with different pdf/ebook I've been testing, just with this specific one.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: evince 2.32.0-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-23.40-generic 2.6.35.7
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-23-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: amd64
Date: Thu Feb 16 16:55:22 2012
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/evince
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release amd64 (20101007)
ProcEnviron:
LANG=pl_PL.utf8
SHELL=/bin/bash
LANGUAGE=
SourcePackage: evince

Tags:

Revision history for this message

l0co (l0co) wrote on 2012-02-16:

Screenshot Edit (185.4 KiB, image/png)
Dependencies.txt Edit (4.7 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
KernLog.txt Edit (22.3 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
ProcMaps.txt Edit (43.1 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
ProcStatus.txt Edit (803 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
RelatedPackageVersions.txt Edit (171 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
XsessionErrors.txt Edit (3.0 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")

Revision history for this message

Vadim Rutkovsky (roignac) wrote on 2012-02-17:

Could you please attach this file to the report?

Revision history for this message

Vadim Rutkovsky (roignac) wrote on 2012-02-17:

Possibly this is a duplicate of bug #704232
---
Ubuntu Bug Squad volunteer triager
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad

Revision history for this message

l0co (l0co) wrote on 2012-02-17:

Unfortunately I cannot do it because this is proprietary bought ebook. However I tested the PDF from the related ticket, and this is the same. So, this is a duplicate