package doc-base 0.9.5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

Bug #933237 reported by Tony Pratschke
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
doc-base (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

I am using a computer which before now was running under Windows XP Professional. I wanted a computer that I could use for translation work mainly so I downloaded and tried to install Tuxtrans (full version). I got a purple screen but nothing else! I then downloaded and installed Ubuntu 11.04,, 10.04 and 9.04. They did not install properly. I then downloaded the Tuxtrans Essential package which is based on Ubuntu 9.04 and it installed perfectly and worked perfectly. Then I received the message that downloads were available so I decided to try these so that I could climb back up to 10.04 LTS. On rebooting the computer I got the message that the screen should be changed to 12?? by 1024. Tried that but didn't work properly. Eventually discovered that the top bar was out of sight at the top. After clicking around the top of the screen I eventually found how to move the top-bar menu to the bottom.

I have used Tuxtrans before on this machine. I doubt that the problem is due to a bug, but I am still relatively new to FLOSS and Ubuntu and don't know how I should proceed from here. I would be happy if I could settle on Ubuntu 10.04 with the Tuxtrans programms

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: doc-base 0.9.5
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-21.32-generic-pae 2.6.32.11+drm33.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-21-generic-pae i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Thu Feb 16 02:18:08 2012
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
InstallationMedia: tuxtrans essentials (2010_05) - Release i386
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: doc-base
Title: package doc-base 0.9.5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

Revision history for this message
Tony Pratschke (wolflander) wrote :
Revision history for this message
dino99 (9d9) wrote :

This version has expired long times ago, and so will never get support

Changed in doc-base (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.