Rename Android Build jobs to have more informative names

Bug #925453 reported by Paul Sokolovsky
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Linaro Android Infrastructure
Fix Released
High
Paul Sokolovsky

Bug Description

From Zach's mail, after maillist discussion:

From: Zach Pfeffer <email address hidden>
To: Paul Sokolovsky <email address hidden>
Cc: linaro-android <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: New build naming convention
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:51:03 -0600

On 31 January 2012 12:52, Paul Sokolovsky <email address hidden> wrote:
> Zach, so lost you from IRC and didn't proceed with it w/o confirming
> final bits. So, please confirm we want board name at the beginning and
> that we want *renames*, and I can do it tomorrow morning.

Sorry had to run off. Yup, lets move ahead with the renames.

> Thanks,
> Paul
>
>
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:48:46 +0200
> Paul Sokolovsky <email address hidden> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:41:47 -0600
>> Zach Pfeffer <email address hidden> wrote:
>>
>> > Okay so taking everyone's input to-date the current list is:
>> >
>> > <target>-<android>-<toolchain>-<kernel_origin>-<kernel_type>-<enablement_type>
>> >
>> >
>> > staging-vexpress-a9
>> > vexpress-ics-gcc46-armlt-stable-open
>>
>> I believe John suggested to have board name closer to the front, but
>> not the first. After "ics" they will be j-something, and having
>> downloads/builds be sorted by release is good thing IMHO.
>>
>> >
>> > tracking-panda
>> > panda-ics-gcc46-tilt-tracking-blob
>> >
>> > aosp-panda
>> > panda-ics-gcc44-aosp-stable-blob
>> >
>> > staging-imx53
>> > imx53-ics-gcc46-freescalelt-stable-open
>> >
>> > panda-4.4
>> > panda-ics-gcc46-kwg-upstream-open
>> >
>> > landing-snowball
>> > snowball-ics-gcc46-igloo-stable-blob
>> >
>> > landing-panda
>> > panda-ics-gcc46-omapzoom-stable-blob
>> >
>> > staging-panda
>> > panda-ics-gcc46-tilt-stable-blob
>> >
>> > staging-origen
>> > origen-ics-gcc46-samsunglt-stable-blob
>> >
>> > panda
>> > panda-ics-gcc46-kwg-upstream-open
>> >
>> > panda-4.4
>> > panda-ics-gcc44-aosp-stable-blob
>> >
>> > ANy other input before we switch over today?
>> >
>> >
>> > On 31 January 2012 10:34, Zach Pfeffer <email address hidden>
>> > wrote:
>> > > On 31 January 2012 07:44, Patrik Ryd <email address hidden>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >> On 31 January 2012 12:02, Alexander Sack <email address hidden> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Tony Mansson
>> > >>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > The full names are kind of cumbersome to use in everyday
>> > >>> > speech so I predict
>> > >>> > nicknames :)
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Very good point. Do we want to set up nicknames proactively or
>> > >>> just see what happens?
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> I suggest we call the snowball build Yeti since that was my
>> > >> suggestion for the name of the board, but the jury selected
>> > >> snowball. :)
>> > >>
>> > >> I think most of us will ignore ics, and gcc in the name and just
>> > >> call it the upstream- or stable-snowball and so on.
>> > >>
>> > >> And +1 on Jons comment about the order.
>> > >>
>> > >> Do we really need all pf the builds? I think not only the names,
>> > >> but the number of builds have caused some confusion. Didn't we
>> > >> have an idea that we would try to reduce the number of manifests?
>> > >
>> > > Actually, once LAVA starts testing build with
>> > > linaro-android-media-create and we get some better coverage
>> > > there's a few more builds we want to spin up.
>> > >
>> > > But we should get back to 4 mainline builds again.
>> > >
>> > > One big issue we need to address is that users of our builds don't
>> > > really want the 4.6 toolchain. They want AOSP for their board. So
>> > > it may be that we refigure stuff to have one 4.6 toolchain build
>> > > and the rest on 4.4 stock.
>> > >
>> > >>  /Patrik
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> --
>> > >>> Alexander Sack
>> > >>> Technical Director, Linaro Platform Teams
>> > >>> http://www.linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
>> > >>> http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg -
>> > >>> http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
>> > >>>
>> > >>> _______________________________________________
>> > >>> linaro-android mailing list
>> > >>> <email address hidden>
>> > >>> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-android
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> _______________________________________________
>> > >> linaro-android mailing list
>> > >> <email address hidden>
>> > >> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-android
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Zach Pfeffer
>> > > Android Platform Team Lead, Linaro Platform Teams
>> > > Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
>> > > Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro
>> > > http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg -
>> > > http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Paul
>
> Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
> Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro
> http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog

--
Zach Pfeffer
Android Platform Team Lead, Linaro Platform Teams
Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro
http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog

Revision history for this message
Paul Sokolovsky (pfalcon) wrote :

Done.

Changed in linaro-android-infrastructure:
milestone: none → 2012.02
importance: Undecided → High
assignee: nobody → Paul Sokolovsky (pfalcon)
status: New → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.