kdelibs4-dev unmet dependencies in sid

[Debian Bug Importer]

Automatically imported from Debian bug report #277037 http://bugs.debian.org/277037

[Debian Bug Importer (debzilla)]

Automatically imported from Debian bug report #277037 http://bugs.debian.org/277037

[Debian Bug Importer (debzilla)]

Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 22:48:31 -0500
From: Chad Davis <email address hidden>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <email address hidden>
Subject: kdelibs4-dev unmet dependencies in sid

Package: kdelibs4-dev
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Not able to apt-get kdelibs4-dev with unstable sources.list:

root@reject:~# apt-get install kdelibs4-dev
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  kdelibs4-dev: Depends: libarts1-dev (> 1.3.0) but it is not going to
  be installed
                  Depends: libcupsys2-dev but it is not going to be
    installed
    E: Broken packages
    root@reject:~#

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8.1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

[Matt Zimmerman (mdz)]

Installable in warty

[Helge Kreutzmann (kreutzm)]

tags 277037 + sid
thanks

--
Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. <email address hidden>
                       gpg signed mail preferred
    64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm
       Help keep free software "libre": http://www.freepatents.org/

[Dato Simó (dato)]

* Chad Davis [Sun, 17 Oct 2004 22:48:31 -0500]:

> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> kdelibs4-dev: Depends: libarts1-dev (> 1.3.0) but it is not going to
> be installed
> Depends: libcupsys2-dev but it is not going to be
> installed
> E: Broken packages
> root@reject:~#

  this is most likely a misconfiguration on your system. can you please
  show us the output of:

    $ apt-cache policy libcupsys2-dev

  thanks,

--
Adeodato Simó
    EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621

The pure and simple truth is rarely pure and never simple.
                -- Oscar Wilde

[Debian Bug Importer (debzilla)]

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 09:40:01 +0200
From: Helge Kreutzmann <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Unstable affected

tags 277037 + sid
thanks

--
Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. <email address hidden>
                       gpg signed mail preferred
    64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm
       Help keep free software "libre": http://www.freepatents.org/

[Debian Bug Importer (debzilla)]

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 10:38:42 +0200
From: Adeodato =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sim=F3?= <email address hidden>
To: Chad Davis <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#277037: kdelibs4-dev unmet dependencies in sid

* Chad Davis [Sun, 17 Oct 2004 22:48:31 -0500]:

> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> kdelibs4-dev: Depends: libarts1-dev (> 1.3.0) but it is not going to
> be installed
> Depends: libcupsys2-dev but it is not going to be
> installed
> E: Broken packages
> root@reject:~#

  this is most likely a misconfiguration on your system. can you please
  show us the output of:

    $ apt-cache policy libcupsys2-dev

  thanks,

--
Adeodato Sim� EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621

The pure and simple truth is rarely pure and never simple.
                -- Oscar Wilde

[Chad Davis (mindphasr)]

root@reject:~# apt-cache policy libcupsys2-dev
libcupsys2-dev:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 1.1.20final+rc1-9
  Version Table:
     1.1.21-0.experimental2 0
        650 ftp://ftp.debian.org ../project/experimental/main Packages
     1.1.20final+rc1-9 0
        990 http://http.us.debian.org unstable/main Packages
     1.1.14-5woody10 0
        500 http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main Packages
root@reject:~#

I have experimental in sources.list because I am using it for gnome
2.8. I was under the impression things from experimental were always
last in the policy?

Thanks!

--
Chad Davis
<email address hidden>

[Debian Bug Importer (debzilla)]

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 12:36:27 -0500
From: Chad Davis <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject:

root@reject:~# apt-cache policy libcupsys2-dev
libcupsys2-dev:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 1.1.20final+rc1-9
  Version Table:
     1.1.21-0.experimental2 0
        650 ftp://ftp.debian.org ../project/experimental/main Packages
     1.1.20final+rc1-9 0
        990 http://http.us.debian.org unstable/main Packages
     1.1.14-5woody10 0
        500 http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main Packages
root@reject:~#

I have experimental in sources.list because I am using it for gnome
2.8. I was under the impression things from experimental were always
last in the policy?

Thanks!

--
Chad Davis
<email address hidden>

[Josh Metzler (joshdeb)]

On Thursday 21 October 2004 01:36 pm, Chad Davis wrote:
> root@reject:~# apt-cache policy libcupsys2-dev
> libcupsys2-dev:
> Installed: (none)
> Candidate: 1.1.20final+rc1-9
> Version Table:
> 1.1.21-0.experimental2 0
> 650 ftp://ftp.debian.org ../project/experimental/main Packages
> 1.1.20final+rc1-9 0
> 990 http://http.us.debian.org unstable/main Packages
> 1.1.14-5woody10 0
> 500 http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main Packages
> root@reject:~#
>
> I have experimental in sources.list because I am using it for gnome
> 2.8. I was under the impression things from experimental were always
> last in the policy?
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Chad Davis
> <email address hidden>

$ apt-cache policy libcupsys2-dev
libcupsys2-dev:
  Installed: 1.1.20final+rc1-9
  Candidate: 1.1.20final+rc1-9
  Version Table:
     1.1.21-0.experimental2 0
          1 ftp://ftp.us.debian.org ../project/experimental/main Packages
 *** 1.1.20final+rc1-9 0
        500 ftp://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/main Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

Yes - they have a priority of 1. Do you have experimental pinned at 650
in /etc/apt/preferences?

Josh

[Debian Bug Importer (debzilla)]

Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:20:43 -0400
From: Josh Metzler <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#277037:

On Thursday 21 October 2004 01:36 pm, Chad Davis wrote:
> root@reject:~# apt-cache policy libcupsys2-dev
> libcupsys2-dev:
> Installed: (none)
> Candidate: 1.1.20final+rc1-9
> Version Table:
> 1.1.21-0.experimental2 0
> 650 ftp://ftp.debian.org ../project/experimental/main Packages
> 1.1.20final+rc1-9 0
> 990 http://http.us.debian.org unstable/main Packages
> 1.1.14-5woody10 0
> 500 http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main Packages
> root@reject:~#
>
> I have experimental in sources.list because I am using it for gnome
> 2.8. I was under the impression things from experimental were always
> last in the policy?
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Chad Davis
> <email address hidden>

$ apt-cache policy libcupsys2-dev
libcupsys2-dev:
  Installed: 1.1.20final+rc1-9
  Candidate: 1.1.20final+rc1-9
  Version Table:
     1.1.21-0.experimental2 0
          1 ftp://ftp.us.debian.org ../project/experimental/main Packages
 *** 1.1.20final+rc1-9 0
        500 ftp://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/main Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

Yes - they have a priority of 1. Do you have experimental pinned at 650
in /etc/apt/preferences?

Josh

[Dato Simó (dato)]

* Chad Davis [Thu, 21 Oct 2004 12:36:27 -0500]:

> 1.1.14-5woody10 0
> 500 http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main Packages

  you shouldn't have security in your sources.list when you're using
  testing or unstable. this leads me to think there may exist some other
  misconfiguration on your system that is causing the problem.

  I suggest you take some time and try to find out what's wrong with
  your installation.

> I have experimental in sources.list because I am using it for gnome
> 2.8. I was under the impression things from experimental were always
> last in the policy?

  not if you pin them.

--
Adeodato Simó
    EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621

Russian roulette in bash: ((RANDOM%6)) || rm -rf ~

[Debian Bug Importer (debzilla)]

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 02:33:07 +0200
From: Adeodato =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sim=F3?= <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#277037:

* Chad Davis [Thu, 21 Oct 2004 12:36:27 -0500]:

> 1.1.14-5woody10 0
> 500 http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main Packages

  you shouldn't have security in your sources.list when you're using
  testing or unstable. this leads me to think there may exist some other
  misconfiguration on your system that is causing the problem.

  I suggest you take some time and try to find out what's wrong with
  your installation.

> I have experimental in sources.list because I am using it for gnome
> 2.8. I was under the impression things from experimental were always
> last in the policy?

  not if you pin them.

--
Adeodato Sim� EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621

Russian roulette in bash: ((RANDOM%6)) || rm -rf ~

[Ben Burton (bab)]

severity 277037 important
thanks mate

Hi. Since this appears it may be related to the apt configuration
on the user's system, I'm downgrading this bug to important.

b.

[Debian Bug Importer (debzilla)]

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 07:59:00 +1000
From: Ben Burton <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Downgrading kdelibs4-dev dependency bug

severity 277037 important
thanks mate

Hi. Since this appears it may be related to the apt configuration
on the user's system, I'm downgrading this bug to important.

b.

[Dato Simó (dato)]

# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
tags 277037 unreproducible moreinfo

[Debian Bug Importer (debzilla)]

Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:54:23 +0200
From: Adeodato Simó <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: tagging 277037

# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
tags 277037 unreproducible moreinfo

[Josh Metzler (joshdeb)]

On Sunday 17 October 2004 11:48 pm, Chad Davis wrote:
> Package: kdelibs4-dev
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Not able to apt-get kdelibs4-dev with unstable sources.list:
>
> root@reject:~# apt-get install kdelibs4-dev
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
>
> Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
> the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
> that package should be filed.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> kdelibs4-dev: Depends: libarts1-dev (> 1.3.0) but it is not going to
> be installed
> Depends: libcupsys2-dev but it is not going to be
> installed
> E: Broken packages
> root@reject:~#
>
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: 3.1
> APT prefers unstable
> APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
> Architecture: i386 (i686)
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.8.1
> Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Chad,

Have you resolved this yet? If not, please show us the output of

apt-get -s install libcupsys2-dev

Thanks,
Josh

[Debian Bug Importer (debzilla)]

Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:02:12 -0400
From: Josh Metzler <email address hidden>
To: Chad Davis <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#277037: kdelibs4-dev unmet dependencies in sid

On Sunday 17 October 2004 11:48 pm, Chad Davis wrote:
> Package: kdelibs4-dev
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Not able to apt-get kdelibs4-dev with unstable sources.list:
>
> root@reject:~# apt-get install kdelibs4-dev
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
>
> Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
> the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
> that package should be filed.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> kdelibs4-dev: Depends: libarts1-dev (> 1.3.0) but it is not going to
> be installed
> Depends: libcupsys2-dev but it is not going to be
> installed
> E: Broken packages
> root@reject:~#
>
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: 3.1
> APT prefers unstable
> APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
> Architecture: i386 (i686)
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.8.1
> Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Chad,

Have you resolved this yet? If not, please show us the output of

apt-get -s install libcupsys2-dev

Thanks,
Josh

[Josh Metzler (joshdeb)]

The submitter acknowledged that he had experimental pinned at 650 and sid at
600. He did not say that changing this solved his problem, but as it
should have and he has not replied since, I am closing this bug.

Josh

[Debian Bug Importer (debzilla)]

Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 21:02:30 -0500
From: Josh Metzler <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: from private e-mail, submitter had experimental pinned above unstable

The submitter acknowledged that he had experimental pinned at 650 and sid at
600. He did not say that changing this solved his problem, but as it
should have and he has not replied since, I am closing this bug.

Josh