Ubuntu
samba4 package

package samba4 4.0.0~alpha17.dfsg2-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

Bug #912848 reported by pawnrocket on 2012-01-06

This bug report is a duplicate of: Bug #832465: upgradeprovision: guess_names: 'realm =' was not specified in supplied /etc/samba/smb.conf. Please remove the smb.conf file and let provision generate it. Edit Remove

This bug affects 1 person

Affects		Status	Importance	Assigned to	Milestone
	samba4 (Ubuntu)	Confirmed	Undecided	Unassigned

Bug Description

While installing samba4
ubuntu 12.04

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: samba4 4.0.0~alpha17.dfsg2-1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-7.13-generic 3.2.0-rc7
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-7-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: wl
ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
Date: Fri Jan 6 12:12:56 2012
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Alpha amd64 (20120105)
SourcePackage: samba4
Title: package samba4 4.0.0~alpha17.dfsg2-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

Tags:

Revision history for this message

pawnrocket (jason-a-vivier) wrote on 2012-01-06:

AptOrdering.txt Edit (1.2 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Dependencies.txt Edit (2.1 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Df.txt Edit (528 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Dmesg.txt Edit (97.8 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
DpkgHistoryLog.txt Edit (65.3 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
DpkgTerminalLog.txt Edit (6.7 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
DuplicateSignature.txt Edit (1.9 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")

Apport retracing service (apport) on 2012-01-06

tags:

removed: need-duplicate-check

Revision history for this message

Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote on 2012-01-11:

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

Changed in samba4 (Ubuntu):
status:	New → Confirmed

Revision history for this message

Brendan Powers (brendan0powers) wrote on 2012-02-08:

Should the provision script be run during package installation? I don't think a fully provisioned domain is what a user expects after installing this package. Also, the needed fields, realm, FQDN, etc... may not be set up properly during installation.