gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in g_spawn_async_with_pipes()

Bug #908616 reported by kelargo
This bug report is a duplicate of:  Edit Remove
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gnome-panel (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

newly installed on notebook, trying to use gnome classic, since unity is not very useful.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: gnome-panel 1:3.3.3-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-6.12-generic 3.2.0-rc6
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-6-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sun Dec 25 15:56:33 2011
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-panel
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release amd64 (20110720.1)
ProcCmdline: gnome-panel
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x7fbc3b22fc5b: mov %r9b,(%rax)
 PC (0x7fbc3b22fc5b) ok
 source "%r9b" ok
 destination "(%rax)" (0x7fbc3ac713a0) in non-writable VMA region: 0x7fbc3ac66000-0x7fbc3ad56000 r-xp /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.3104.0
SegvReason: writing VMA /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.3104.0
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: gnome-panel
StacktraceTop:
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
 g_spawn_async_with_pipes () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
 g_spawn_async () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
Title: gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in g_spawn_async_with_pipes()
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2011-12-25 (0 days ago)
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout dip fax floppy fuse lpadmin plugdev sambashare tape video

Revision history for this message
kelargo (kelong-2000) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #906244, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.
  • Duplicate of a private bug Remove

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.