Microsoft Nano Transceiver failed to initialize relative axes
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) |
Expired
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
None
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: xorg 1:7.6+7ubuntu7
ProcVersionSign
Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic i686
.tmp.unity.
ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu3
Architecture: i386
CompizPlugins: No value set for `/apps/
CompositorRunning: None
Date: Mon Oct 10 18:14:02 2011
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: oneiric
DistroVariant: ubuntu
ExtraDebuggingI
GraphicsCard:
Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:2a42] (rev 07) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:3072]
Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:3072]
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Beta i386 (20111007.1)
MachineType: Hewlett-Packard HP ProBook 4510s
ProcEnviron:
LANGUAGE=en_ZA:en
PATH=(custom, no user)
LANG=en_ZA.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=
SourcePackage: xorg
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 04/03/2009
dmi.bios.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
dmi.bios.version: 68PZI Ver. F.03
dmi.board.name: 3072
dmi.board.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
dmi.board.version: KBC Version 24.0B
dmi.chassis.
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnHewlett-
dmi.product.name: HP ProBook 4510s
dmi.product.
dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.6+
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.26-1ubuntu1
version.
version.
version.
version.
version.
version.
version.
version.
affects: | xorg (Ubuntu) → xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) |
Hey mcbotha,
Hi, thanks for reporting this issue during the development period of
Ubuntu.
I notice there's not been further comments to the bug report since the
release came out, would you mind updating us on the status of it in the
release?
Are you still able to reproduce the issue? If not, do you think the bug
report can be closed, or do you think we should continue tracking it?